From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: Racy loop device reuse logic
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:34:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220119213449.jydoqbyzjudqmikk@quack3.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220119113900.tm5j65wzxglggsig@ws.net.home>
On Wed 19-01-22 12:39:00, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Ping? Any opinion?
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> > On Thu 13-01-22 16:47:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Tetsuo has been doing some changes to the loop device shutdown in the
> > > kernel and that broke LTP that is doing essentially the following loop:
> > >
> > > while :; do mount -o loop,ro isofs.iso isofs/; umount isofs/; done
> > >
> > > And this loop is broken because of a subtle interaction with systemd-udev
> > > that also opens the loop device. The race seems to be in mount(8) handling
> > > itself and the altered kernel timing makes it happen. It look like:
> > >
> > > bash systemd-udev
> > > mount -o loop,ro isofs.iso isofs/
> > > /dev/loop0 is created and bound to isofs.iso, autoclear is set for
> > > loop0
> > > opens /dev/loop0
> > > umount isofs/
> > > loop0 still lives because systemd-udev still has device open
> > > mount -o loop,ro isofs.iso isofs/
> > > gets to mnt_context_setup_loopdev()
> > > loopcxt_find_overlap()
> > > sees loop0 is still valid and with proper parameters
> > > reuse = true;
> > > close /dev/loop0
> > > last fd closed => loop0 is
> > > cleaned up
> > > loopcxt_get_fd()
> > > opens loop0 but it is no longer the device we wanted!
> > > calls mount(2) which fails because we cannot read from the loop device
> > >
> > > It seems to me that mnt_context_setup_loopdev() should actually recheck
> > > that loop device parameters still match what we need after opening
> > > /dev/loop0 (if LOOP_GET_STATUS ioctl succeeds on the fd, you are guaranteed
> > > the loop device is in that state and will not be torn down under your
> > > hands). What do you think?
>
> Seems like elegant solution. Please, send a patch.
OK, will do.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-13 15:47 Racy loop device reuse logic Jan Kara
2022-01-19 8:52 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-19 11:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-01-19 21:34 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-20 8:50 ` Karel Zak
2022-01-20 10:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-01-19 11:39 ` Karel Zak
2022-01-19 21:34 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-01-20 12:13 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220119213449.jydoqbyzjudqmikk@quack3.lan \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox