Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add functions to the fsck wrapper to improve standalone operation.

["Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>]

On 02/15/2012 03:09 PM, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> 2012/2/15 Pádraig Brady <P@draigbrady.com>:
>> On 02/07/2012 09:05 PM, Frank Mayhar wrote:
>>> This set of patches adds functions that help improve fsck operation in
>>> large installations and when running in unattended or headless mode.  It
>>> adds support for reporting rusage statistics for the individual fsck
>>> runs, for capturing fsck output, for killing fsck runs that take too
>>> long and for running scripts when each fsck completes.
>>>
>>> We're currently using these functions to improve our fsck monitoring
>>> capability and to replace some unwieldy and hard-to-maintain shell
>>> scripts.
>>
>> Couldn't you do this with separate fsck command runs,
>> and use standard system utils?
> 
> Yes, of course.  That's where the "unwieldy and hard-to-maintain shell
> scripts" came in.  Putting the functions in the wrapper itself, on the
> other hand, means the scripts don't have to reimplement functions that
> already exist there (like parallelizing the fsck runs or tracking exit
> status), eliminates some external dependencies and makes the process
> quite a bit less fragile.

OK, thanks for the clarification.

It seems to me that these functions are supported
by quite simple shell scripting as I demonstrated.
I do agree it's a margin call, but I'd be on the
side of not bringing that logic within fsck.

cheers,
Pádraig.