From: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@suse.cz>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org, "David Štěrba" <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libmount: handle btrfs default subvolume mount
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:22:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AA240F.5010900@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A15487.8020500@suse.cz>
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Known problems not covered by this patch:
>
> - Use of subvolid= in fstab is not yet handled.
Patch already created, see mails:
[PATCH 1/2] libmount: run btrfs subvol checks for "subvolid" option
[PATCH 2/2] libmount: code re-indentation
> - Use of type auto in combination with subvol= in fstab is not yet
> handled.
Patch already created, see:
[PATCH] libmount: run btrfs subvol checks for "auto" fs type
> - Use of btrfs in loop devices, where image file is specified in fstab is
> not yet handled (use of /dev/loop0 in fstab works).
With all patches above, I cannot reproduce any more.
Tested situations:
- with and without "loop" option
- with "subvol" or "subvolid" options referring to non-default subvolume
- without "subvol" or "subvolid" referring to default subvolume
- with "btrfs" and "auto" fs type
=> I think that it is now fixed as well.
> - If fstab uses subvol=, and subvol path changes since last "mount -a",
> subsequent "mount -a" will not recognize that it is already mounted,
> and it will attempt to mount it second time. To fix it, libmount should
> remember subvolid in time of mount (subvolid is unique for the
> subvolume, subvol is not).
I have no plans to write a fix for that now. Too obscure situation.
> - mountinfo contains subvol and subvolid since kernel 4.2. Before kernel
> 4.2, there is no reasonable way to solve this situation. (One would
> create temporary mount point, mount the default, call needed ioctl() to
> determine what was mounted, deduce the default subvolume, compare it
> with subvolume of mounted volume, unmount and return result.)
There is no reasonable way to detect whether default subvolume was mounted.
In case of mounting with subvolid, there is a way to detect subvolume
path even before kernel 4.2: If mountinfo lookup fails, then use
btrfs_get_default_subvolume_path(). (See my mail dated
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:24:59 +0100 in this thread.) However fix is possible
here, I have no plan to extent
[PATCH 1/2] libmount: run btrfs subvol checks for "subvolid" option
and implement it. It would be a fix of obscure situation in a kernel
with unfixable issues of more common cases.
Summary: After applying of all patches mentioned here, I consider btrfs
support as fixed in new kernels.
I strongly discourage advanced use of btrfs in fstab before kernel 4.2.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec@suse.com
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +49 911 7405384547
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 084 001
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
PGP: 830B 40D5 9E05 35D8 5E27 6FA3 717C 209F A04F CD76
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 20:34 [PATCH] libmount: handle btrfs default subvolume mount Stanislav Brabec
2016-01-20 21:51 ` Stanislav Brabec
2016-01-20 21:57 ` Stanislav Brabec
2016-01-21 9:48 ` Karel Zak
2016-01-21 15:24 ` Stanislav Brabec
2016-01-21 15:37 ` Karel Zak
2016-01-21 15:45 ` Karel Zak
2016-01-21 17:24 ` Stanislav Brabec
2016-01-22 8:42 ` David Sterba
2016-01-21 21:58 ` Stanislav Brabec
2016-01-26 10:15 ` Karel Zak
2016-01-28 14:22 ` Stanislav Brabec [this message]
2016-02-01 12:18 ` Karel Zak
2016-02-01 15:38 ` Stanislav Brabec
2016-02-02 10:11 ` Karel Zak
2016-02-02 15:04 ` Stanislav Brabec
2016-02-02 18:43 ` Karel Zak
2016-02-02 19:36 ` Stanislav Brabec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56AA240F.5010900@suse.cz \
--to=sbrabec@suse.cz \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox