From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH V2] virtio-net: introduce admin control virtqueue
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:54:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125135456.514bca2b.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210125055202.29001-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:52:02 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> When implementing virtual devices like SR-IOV or sub-function. We're
> suffering from several issues:
>
> - There's no management interface for management device to
> configure features, attributes for a virtual device
> - Per virtual device control virtqueue could be very expensive as the
> number of virtual devices could be very large
> - Virtualize per virtual device's control virtqueue could be very
> challenge as we need the support of DMA isolation at queue level
>
> So this patch introduces the feature of VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_ADMIN_VQ. This
> allows the device to implement a single admin control virtqueue to
> manage the features and attributes for a specific virtual device.
>
> The idea is simple, a new virtual device id is introduced on top of
> the existing virtio_net_ctrl structure. This id is transport or device
> specific to uniquely identify a management or virtual device.
>
> With this, we get a way of using management device (PF) to configure
> per virtual device features and attributes. And since the admin
> control virtqueue belongs to management device (PF), the DMA is
> naturally isolated at device level instead of the queue level for per
> virtual device control vq.
>
> When the admin cvq is offered by management device and normal cvq is
> offered by virtual device. A new command class is introduced decide
> whether or not to accept commands from normal cvq for a virtual
> device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> - use 'virtual device' instead of 'function'
> - introuce trust command
> - clairfy that the admin cvq could be used to configure management
> device itself
> ---
> content.tex | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 620c0e2..989b4f6 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -2940,6 +2940,9 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Feature bits
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR(23)] Set MAC address through control
> channel.
>
> +\item[VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ(56)] Admin control channel is
> + available.
> +
> \item[VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT(57)] Device can report per-packet hash
> value and a type of calculated hash.
>
> @@ -3840,11 +3843,12 @@ \subsubsection{Processing of Incoming Packets}\label{sec:Device Types / Network
> \subsubsection{Control Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue}
>
> The driver uses the control virtqueue (if VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ is
> -negotiated) to send commands to manipulate various features of
> -the device which would not easily map into the configuration
> -space.
> +negotiated but VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ is not negotiated) to send
> +commands to manipulate various features of the device which would not
> +easily map into the configuration space.
>
> All commands are of the following form:
> +is not negotiated:
Stray hunk.
>
> \begin{lstlisting}
> struct virtio_net_ctrl {
> @@ -3864,6 +3868,29 @@ \subsubsection{Control Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Devi
> do except issue a diagnostic if \field{ack} is not
> VIRTIO_NET_OK.
>
> +When both VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ and VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ are
> +negotiated, the driver can use the admin control virtqueue of the
> +management device to manipulate features of individual virtual devices
> +where the control virtqueue is not easily implemented. The definition
> +of management device and virtual device is transport or device
> +specific. E.g in the case of PCI SR-IOV, the management device is
> +implemented via the physical function (PF), then the virtual device is
> +the virtual function (VF) in this case.
"...if the management device is implemented via the physical function
(PF), the virtual device is implemented via the virtual function (VF)."
?
> +
> +All commands are of the following form:
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +struct virtio_net_admin_ctrl {
> + u32 virtual_device_id;
> + struct virtio_net_ctrl ctrl;
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +The \field{virtual_device_id} is an unique transport or device specific
> +identifier for a virtual device or management device. E.g for the case
> +of PCI SR-IOV, it's the PCI function id. Management device MUST
"...it is the PCI function id of the virtual function." ?
s/Management device/The management device/
> +reserve 0 for \field{virtual_device_id} to identify itself.
"reserve", or rather "use"?
That also implies that virtual_device_id must be != 0 for virtual
devices, doesn't it?
> +
> \paragraph{Packet Receive Filtering}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Packet Receive Filtering}
> \label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Promiscuous Mode}%old label for latexdiff
>
> @@ -4308,6 +4335,32 @@ \subsubsection{Control Virtqueue}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Devi
> according to the native endian of the guest rather than
> (necessarily when not using the legacy interface) little-endian.
>
> +\paragraph{Setting Trust for Virtual Device}\label{sec:Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Trust for Virtual Device}
> +
> +If the VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ is negotiated, the management device
> +can accept operations via the control vq from the trusted virtual
"can accept the following operations" ?
(in addition to existing control commands?)
> +device.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST 0
> + #define VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST_ENABLE 0
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +\devicenormative{\subparagraph}{Setting Trust for Virtual Device}{Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Trust for Virtual Device}
> +
> +If the VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ has been negotiated, the device MUST
s/If the/If/
> +support VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST class
s/support/support the/
> +command. VIRTIO_NET_ADMIN_CTRL_TRUST_ENABLE turns trust for the
> +control virtqueue of a specific virtual device on and off. The command
> +specific data is one byte containing 0(off) or 1(on). When trust is
> +off the device MUST fail any operations from the control virtqueue of
> +the virtual device. The management device MUST NOT trust any virtual
> +devices after reset.
A bit further up, it is stated that the management device can accept
operations from a "trusted virtual device". From this statement here, I
get that the trust state can be turned on and off by the virtual device.
Does the management device get to choose if it wants to trust a virtual
device, i.e. can it fail enabling the trust?
> +
> +\drivernormative{\subparagraph}{Setting Trust for Virtual Device}{Device Types / Network Device / Device Operation / Control Virtqueue / Setting Trust for Virtual Device}
> +
> +A driver SHOULD negotiate VIRTIO_NET_F_ADMIN_CTRL_VQ if the device
> +offers it.
>
> \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Framing Requirements}\label{sec:Device
> Types / Network Device / Legacy Interface: Framing Requirements}
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 5:52 [virtio-comment] [PATCH V2] virtio-net: introduce admin control virtqueue Jason Wang
2021-01-25 6:31 ` Haozhong Zhang
2021-01-25 6:45 ` Jason Wang
2021-01-25 7:05 ` Haozhong Zhang
2021-01-25 7:48 ` Jason Wang
2021-01-25 10:22 ` Haozhong Zhang
2021-01-27 3:21 ` Jason Wang
2021-01-25 12:54 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-01-27 3:30 ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2021-01-27 8:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-01-27 10:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-01-28 2:58 ` Jason Wang
2021-01-29 10:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-01 3:42 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-01 16:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-01-29 22:48 ` [virtio-comment] " Halil Pasic
2021-02-01 4:09 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-01 15:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-02 3:28 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210125135456.514bca2b.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox