Discussion of the VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, sgarzare@redhat.com
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH] virtio-pci: introduce VIRITO_F_QUEUE_STATE
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:24:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315162432.14f5476a.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315025846.6539-1-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:58:46 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:

> This patch adds the ability to save and restore virtqueue state via a
> new field in the common configuration infrastructure.
> 
> To simply the implementation, no new device status is introduced. For
> device, the requirements is not to forget the queue state after
> virtio reset and clear the virtqueue state upon ACKNOWLEDGE. For
> driver, it must set the virtqueue state before setting DRIVER_OK.
> 
> To save a virtqueue state, the driver then need:
> 
> 1) reset device
> 2) read virtqueue statue
> 
> To restore a virtqueue state, the driver need:
> 
> 1) reset device
> 2) perform necessary setups (e.g features negotiation)
> 3) write virtqueue state
> 4) set DRIVER_OK
> 
> The main user should be live migration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  content.tex                 | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  virtqueue-state-packed-le.c |  7 +++++++
>  virtqueue-state-split-le.c  |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 virtqueue-state-packed-le.c
>  create mode 100644 virtqueue-state-split-le.c
> 
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 620c0e2..d7bff25 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -837,6 +837,7 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>          le64 queue_driver;              /* read-write */
>          le64 queue_device;              /* read-write */
>          le16 queue_notify_data;         /* read-only for driver */
> +        le64 queue_state;               /* read-write */
>  };
>  \end{lstlisting}
>  
> @@ -916,6 +917,29 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>          may benefit from providing another value, for example an internal virtqueue
>          identifier, or an internal offset related to the virtqueue number.
>          \end{note}
> +
> +\item[\field{queue_state}]
> +        This field exists only if VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE has been
> +        negotiated. The driver will use this field to get or set the
> +        virtqueue state by reading or writing the 64bit from the
> +        field.
> +        When VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED has not been negotiated, the driver
> +        can set and get the following states:
> +        \lstinputlisting{virtqueue-state-split-le.c}
> +        The field \field{last_avail_idx} is the location where the
> +        device read for next index from the available ring.
> +        When VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED has been negotiated, the driver can
> +        set and get the following states:
> +        \lstinputlisting{virtqueue-state-packed-le.c}
> +        The field \field{last_avail_idx} is the next location where
> +        device read for the next descriptor from the descriptor
> +        ring. The field \field{last_avail_wrap_counter} is the last
> +        driver ring wrap counter that is observed by the device. The
> +        field \field{used_idx} is the next location where device write
> +        used descriptor do descriptor ring. The field
> +        \field{used_wrap_counter} is the wrap counter that is used by
> +        the device. See also \ref{sec:Packed Virtqueues / Driver and Device Ring Wrap Counters}.

While queue_state is a pci-specific field, I don't think any of this is
transport-specific. I think the description of the layout for the queue
state should move into a generic section, and this part only reference
it.

> +
>  \end{description}
>  
>  \devicenormative{\paragraph}{Common configuration structure layout}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Common configuration structure layout}
> @@ -964,6 +988,10 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>  present either a value of 0 or a power of 2 in
>  \field{queue_size}.
>  
> +If VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE has been negotiated, a device MUST NOT clear
> +the queue state upon reset and MUST reset the queue state when
> +ACKNOWLEDGE has been set through \field{device status} bit.

What happens if a driver tries to read the queue status outside of this
window? Should it get zeroes? Unpredictable values?

> +
>  \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Common configuration structure layout}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Common configuration structure layout}
>  
>  The driver MUST NOT write to \field{device_feature}, \field{num_queues}, \field{config_generation}, \field{queue_notify_off} or \field{queue_notify_data}.
> @@ -981,6 +1009,13 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>  
>  The driver MUST NOT write a 0 to \field{queue_enable}.
>  
> +If VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE has been negotiated, a driver SHOULD set the
> +state of each virtqueue through \field{queue_state} before setting the
> +DRIVER_OK \field{device status} bit and SHOULD NOT write to
> +\field{queue_state} after setting the DRIVER_OK \field{device status}
> +bit. If a driver want to get the virtqueue state, it MUST first reset
> +the device then read state from \field{queue_state}.

What should the driver do with a 'fresh' device? Does it need to start
out with a reset, read the (zero) state, and then write it back?

> +
>  \subsubsection{Notification structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Notification capability}
>  
>  The notification location is found using the VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_NOTIFY_CFG
> @@ -6596,6 +6631,9 @@ \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>    transport specific.
>    For more details about driver notifications over PCI see \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notifications}.
>  
> +\item[VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE(40)] This feature indicates that the driver
> +  can set and get the virtqueue state.

Here is probably the best place to put the layout description from the
pci section above, and to refer to the pci-specific implementation
(just as it is done for the driver notifications right above.)

> +
>  \end{description}
>  
>  \drivernormative{\section}{Reserved Feature Bits}{Reserved Feature Bits}
> diff --git a/virtqueue-state-packed-le.c b/virtqueue-state-packed-le.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f21f9c2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/virtqueue-state-packed-le.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +le64 {
> +	last_avail_idx : 15;
> +	last_avail_wrap_counter : 1;
> +	used_idx : 15;
> +	used_wrap_counter : 1;
> +	reserved : 32;
> +};
> diff --git a/virtqueue-state-split-le.c b/virtqueue-state-split-le.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..daeb4a3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/virtqueue-state-split-le.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +le64 {
> +	last_avail_idx : 16;
> +	reserved: 48;
> +};


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-15 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-15  2:58 [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-pci: introduce VIRITO_F_QUEUE_STATE Jason Wang
2021-03-15 12:24 ` [virtio-comment] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-03-16  6:08   ` Jason Wang
2021-03-16  7:37     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-03-15 15:24 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-03-16  2:53   ` Jason Wang
2021-03-16 11:06     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-17  3:43       ` Jason Wang
2021-03-17 12:57         ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210315162432.14f5476a.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rob.miller@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox