From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, sgarzare@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH] virtio-pci: introduce VIRITO_F_QUEUE_STATE
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:06:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316120634.5810ebfc.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0bd20def-b7fe-0bb7-a660-e5745b727289@redhat.com>
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:53:37 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> 在 2021/3/15 下午11:24, Cornelia Huck 写道:
> > On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:58:46 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch adds the ability to save and restore virtqueue state via a
> >> new field in the common configuration infrastructure.
> >>
> >> To simply the implementation, no new device status is introduced. For
> >> device, the requirements is not to forget the queue state after
> >> virtio reset and clear the virtqueue state upon ACKNOWLEDGE. For
> >> driver, it must set the virtqueue state before setting DRIVER_OK.
> >>
> >> To save a virtqueue state, the driver then need:
> >>
> >> 1) reset device
> >> 2) read virtqueue statue
> >>
> >> To restore a virtqueue state, the driver need:
> >>
> >> 1) reset device
> >> 2) perform necessary setups (e.g features negotiation)
> >> 3) write virtqueue state
> >> 4) set DRIVER_OK
> >>
> >> The main user should be live migration.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> content.tex | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> virtqueue-state-packed-le.c | 7 +++++++
> >> virtqueue-state-split-le.c | 4 ++++
> >> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 virtqueue-state-packed-le.c
> >> create mode 100644 virtqueue-state-split-le.c
> >>
> >> @@ -964,6 +988,10 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> >> present either a value of 0 or a power of 2 in
> >> \field{queue_size}.
> >>
> >> +If VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE has been negotiated, a device MUST NOT clear
> >> +the queue state upon reset and MUST reset the queue state when
> >> +ACKNOWLEDGE has been set through \field{device status} bit.
> > What happens if a driver tries to read the queue status outside of this
> > window? Should it get zeroes? Unpredictable values?
>
>
> I'm not sure having normative like this can help. Can we leave it to
> device? I had a driver normative to clarify when should driver read or
> write to the value.
Ok, a normative statement is probably not that useful, if a driver
operating outside of the spec gets to keep the pieces when it breaks.
>
>
> >
> >> +
> >> \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Common configuration structure layout}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Common configuration structure layout}
> >>
> >> The driver MUST NOT write to \field{device_feature}, \field{num_queues}, \field{config_generation}, \field{queue_notify_off} or \field{queue_notify_data}.
> >> @@ -981,6 +1009,13 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> >>
> >> The driver MUST NOT write a 0 to \field{queue_enable}.
> >>
> >> +If VIRTIO_F_QUEUE_STATE has been negotiated, a driver SHOULD set the
> >> +state of each virtqueue through \field{queue_state} before setting the
> >> +DRIVER_OK \field{device status} bit and SHOULD NOT write to
> >> +\field{queue_state} after setting the DRIVER_OK \field{device status}
> >> +bit. If a driver want to get the virtqueue state, it MUST first reset
> >> +the device then read state from \field{queue_state}.
> > What should the driver do with a 'fresh' device? Does it need to start
> > out with a reset, read the (zero) state, and then write it back?
>
>
> If 'fresh' means a normal probe procedure, in this case we don't need to
> get the virtqueue state. What we need is to set a proper state. For
> split virtqueue, the driver should write 0 (as last_avail_idx). For
> packed virtqueue, the driver shoudl write:
>
> {.last_avail_idx = 0, .last_avail_wrap_counter=1, .used_idx=0,
> used_wrap_counter=1}.
Yes, that was what I had been thinking of.
So, I think the driver won't get a useful state if it reads the state
after reset for a previously unused device (the device statement only
says that it MUST NOT clear the state after reset)? Do we need to add a
sentence that a driver needs to do that initial setup of the state for
a device it has not used previously?
>
> If 'fresh' means start device after migration, we need to set the
> virtqueue state to what source gives us:
>
> in src:
>
> 1) reset device
> 2) read virtqueue states
> 3) pass virtqueue states to dst
>
> in dst:
>
> 1) receivce virtqueue states from src
> 2) reset device
> 3) perform necesssary setup ( feature neogitaion etc.)
> 4) set the virtqueue states we received from src.
>
> Btw, it looks to me we need to clearify that "The driver MUST write to
> queue_state after FEATURE_OK but before DRIVER_OK)
Yes, I agree.
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-15 2:58 [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-pci: introduce VIRITO_F_QUEUE_STATE Jason Wang
2021-03-15 12:24 ` [virtio-comment] " Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-03-16 6:08 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-16 7:37 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-03-15 15:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-16 2:53 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-16 11:06 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-03-17 3:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-17 12:57 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210316120634.5810ebfc.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rob.miller@broadcom.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox