From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH RESEND] virtio-net: support setting coalescing params for multiple vqs
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 02:08:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231221020541-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e93bf579-16d7-4c25-b05f-575ac756fae8@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:01:57PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>
>
> 在 2023/12/21 下午2:56, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:40:34PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > > Currently, when each time the driver attempts to update the coalescing parameters
> > > for a vq, it needs to kick the device and wait for the ctrlq response to return.
> > But there's no fundamental reason for it to do so.
>
> Indeed, please look at the current upstream netdim code:
>
> static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
> struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
> struct receive_queue, dim);
> struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
> int i, qnum, err;
>
> if (!rtnl_trylock())
> return;
>
> /* Each rxq's work is queued by "net_dim()->schedule_work()"
> * in response to NAPI traffic changes. Note that dim->profile_ix
> * for each rxq is updated prior to the queuing action.
> * So we only need to traverse and update profiles for all rxqs
> * in the work which is holding rtnl_lock.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
> <-----------------
> rq = &vi->rq[i];
> dim = &rq->dim;
> qnum = rq - vi->rq;
>
> if (!rq->dim_enabled)
> continue;
>
> update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
> dim->profile_ix);
> if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
> update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
> err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, qnum,
> update_moder.usec,
> update_moder.pkts);
> if (err)
> pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim parameters
> on rxq%d\n",
> dev->name, qnum);
> dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
> }
> }
>
> rtnl_unlock();
> }
>
> > It can just as well submit multiple commands and then wait.
>
> Sending multiple commands and then waiting reduces the number of kicks.
> But it does not reduce the number of device DMAs. I already responded to
> this in a thread to Jason.
> please check:
>
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202312/msg00142.html
>
> "
> Overall, batch reqs are sufficient. Because the current major overhead is
> the number of DMAs.
> For example, for a device with 256 queues,
>
> For the current upstream code, the overhead is 256 kicks + 256*8 DMA times.
> The overhead of batch cmds is 1 kick + 256*8 DMA times.
> The overhead of batch reqs is 1 kick + 8 DMA times.
>
> Below is 8 DMA times:
> - get avail idx 1 time
> - Pull available ring information 1 time
> - Pull the desc pointed to by the avail ring 3 times
> - Pull the hdr and out bufs pointed to by avail ring desc 2 times
> - Write once to the status buf pointed to by status 1 time "
>
> Thanks.
So there's more DMA but it's all slow path.
Why do we need to micro-optimize it?
What is the overhead practically, in milliseconds?
--
MST
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 14:40 [virtio-comment] [PATCH RESEND] virtio-net: support setting coalescing params for multiple vqs Heng Qi
2023-12-21 3:37 ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2023-12-21 4:55 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-22 2:40 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-22 6:45 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-22 8:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-26 2:17 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-26 3:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-26 9:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-27 2:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-22 8:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-21 6:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-21 7:01 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-21 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-12-21 7:19 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-21 7:48 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-22 8:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-26 2:04 ` Heng Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231221020541-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox