From: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH RESEND] virtio-net: support setting coalescing params for multiple vqs
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:48:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd7d20bb-15b7-4b87-9761-94b5ddd5eb23@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <046a47b8-c816-4c52-abcc-6e1ec3174b32@linux.alibaba.com>
在 2023/12/21 下午3:19, Heng Qi 写道:
>
>
> 在 2023/12/21 下午3:08, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:01:57PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>>>
>>> 在 2023/12/21 下午2:56, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:40:34PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
>>>>> Currently, when each time the driver attempts to update the
>>>>> coalescing parameters
>>>>> for a vq, it needs to kick the device and wait for the ctrlq
>>>>> response to return.
>>>> But there's no fundamental reason for it to do so.
>>> Indeed, please look at the current upstream netdim code:
>>>
>>> static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> {
>>> struct dim *dim = container_of(work, struct dim, work);
>>> struct receive_queue *rq = container_of(dim,
>>> struct receive_queue, dim);
>>> struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>>> struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>>> struct dim_cq_moder update_moder;
>>> int i, qnum, err;
>>>
>>> if (!rtnl_trylock())
>>> return;
>>>
>>> /* Each rxq's work is queued by "net_dim()->schedule_work()"
>>> * in response to NAPI traffic changes. Note that
>>> dim->profile_ix
>>> * for each rxq is updated prior to the queuing action.
>>> * So we only need to traverse and update profiles for all
>>> rxqs
>>> * in the work which is holding rtnl_lock.
>>> */
>>> for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
>>> <-----------------
>>> rq = &vi->rq[i];
>>> dim = &rq->dim;
>>> qnum = rq - vi->rq;
>>>
>>> if (!rq->dim_enabled)
>>> continue;
>>>
>>> update_moder = net_dim_get_rx_moderation(dim->mode,
>>> dim->profile_ix);
>>> if (update_moder.usec != rq->intr_coal.max_usecs ||
>>> update_moder.pkts != rq->intr_coal.max_packets) {
>>> err = virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi,
>>> qnum,
>>> update_moder.usec,
>>> update_moder.pkts);
>>> if (err)
>>> pr_debug("%s: Failed to send dim
>>> parameters
>>> on rxq%d\n",
>>> dev->name, qnum);
>>> dim->state = DIM_START_MEASURE;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> rtnl_unlock();
>>> }
>>>
>>>> It can just as well submit multiple commands and then wait.
>>> Sending multiple commands and then waiting reduces the number of kicks.
>>> But it does not reduce the number of device DMAs. I already
>>> responded to
>>> this in a thread to Jason.
>>> please check:
>>>
>>> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202312/msg00142.html
>>>
>>>
>>> "
>>> Overall, batch reqs are sufficient. Because the current major
>>> overhead is
>>> the number of DMAs.
>>> For example, for a device with 256 queues,
>>>
>>> For the current upstream code, the overhead is 256 kicks + 256*8 DMA
>>> times.
>>> The overhead of batch cmds is 1 kick + 256*8 DMA times.
>>> The overhead of batch reqs is 1 kick + 8 DMA times.
>>>
>>> Below is 8 DMA times:
>>> - get avail idx 1 time
>>> - Pull available ring information 1 time
>>> - Pull the desc pointed to by the avail ring 3 times
>>> - Pull the hdr and out bufs pointed to by avail ring desc 2 times
>>> - Write once to the status buf pointed to by status 1 time "
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>> So there's more DMA but it's all slow path.
>> Why do we need to micro-optimize it?
>
> On our each DPU, multiple VMs need to be supported. The ctrlq of these
> VMs are simulated by software,
> which consumes limited CPU resources on the DPU.
Each DMA needs to wait for the DMA hw execution to complete. Then the
DPU CPU will do other things, and
it will be scheduled when the DMA execution is completed. Therefore,
more DMA times means more CPU scheduling.
Affects CPU execution efficiency.
And batch reqs, reducing the number of DMA not only improves DPU CPU
execution efficiency, but also optimizes DMA latency.
This is very meaningful for single DPU multi-VM multi-queue scenarios.
> Therefore, optimizing the response speed of ctrlq for netdim can
> better support multiple VMs and the large-queue-sized VM.
>
>> What is the overhead practically, in milliseconds?
>
> Latency overhead is only one aspect. More importantly, limited CPU
> resources need to support
> effective command processing of more VMs and large-queue-sized VMs.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>
>
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
>
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> before posting.
>
> Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
> Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
> Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
> Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 14:40 [virtio-comment] [PATCH RESEND] virtio-net: support setting coalescing params for multiple vqs Heng Qi
2023-12-21 3:37 ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2023-12-21 4:55 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-22 2:40 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-22 6:45 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-22 8:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-26 2:17 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-26 3:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-26 9:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-27 2:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-12-22 8:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-21 6:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-21 7:01 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-21 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-21 7:19 ` Heng Qi
2023-12-21 7:48 ` Heng Qi [this message]
2023-12-22 8:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-12-26 2:04 ` Heng Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd7d20bb-15b7-4b87-9761-94b5ddd5eb23@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox