From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, mst@redhat.com,
jasowang@redhat.com, oren@nvidia.com, parav@nvidia.com,
shahafs@nvidia.com, eperezma@redhat.com, aadam@redhat.com,
bodong@nvidia.com, amikheev@nvidia.com
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] Add virtio Admin Virtqueue specification
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:28:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im0v4yrj.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YP/ffFbeJpDJ3sTG@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
On Tue, Jul 27 2021, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 07:52:53PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> Admin virtqueues will be used to send administrative commands to
>> manipulate various features of the device which would not easily map
>> into the configuration space.
>>
>> The same Admin command format will be used for all virtio devices. The
>> Admin command set will include 4 types of command classes:
>> 1. The generic common class
>> 2. The transport specific class
>> 3. The device specific class
>> 4. The vendor specific class
>>
>> The above mechanism will enable adding various features to the virtio
>> specification, e.g.:
>> 1. Format virtio-blk devices in various configurations (512B block size,
>> 512B + 8B T10-DIF, 4K block size, 4k + 8B T10-DIF, etc..).
>> 2. Live migration management.
>> 3. Encrypt/Decrypt descriptors.
>> 4. Virtualization management.
>> 5. Get device error logs.
>> 6. Implement advanced vendor/device/transport specific features.
>> 7. Run device health test.
>> 8. More.
>>
>> As virtio evolves beyond the para-virt/sw-emulated world, it's mandatory
>> for the specification to become flexible and allow a wider feature set.
>> The corrent ctrl virtq that is defined for some of the virtio devices is
>> device specific and wasn't designed to be a generic virtq for
>> admininistration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> admin-virtq.tex | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> content.tex | 4 +
>> 2 files changed, 245 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 admin-virtq.tex
>>
>> diff --git a/admin-virtq.tex b/admin-virtq.tex
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ccec2ca
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/admin-virtq.tex
>> @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
>> +\section{Admin Virtqueues}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues}
>> +
>> +Admin virtqueues are used to send administrative commands to manipulate
>> +various features of the device which would not easily map into the
>> +configuration space.
>> +
>> +Use of Admin virtqueues is negotiated by the VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ
>> +feature bit.
>> +
>> +Admin virtqueue index may vary among different device types.
>> +
>> +All commands are of the following form:
>> +
>> +\begin{lstlisting}
>> +struct virtio_admin_cmd {
>> + /* Device-readable part */
>> + u8 class;
>> + u8 command;
>> + u8 command-specific-data[];
>> +
>> + /* Device-writable part */
>> + u8 command-specific-result[];
>> + u8 status_type : 4;
>> + u8 reserved : 4;
>> + u8 status;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Status type values */
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_TYPE_GENERIC 0
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_TYPE_CLASS_SPECIFIC 1
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_TYPE_COMMAND_SPECIFIC 2
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_TYPE_TRANSPORT_SPECIFIC 3
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_TYPE_DEVICE_SPECIFIC 4
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_TYPE_VENDOR_SPECIFIC 5
>> +
>> +/* Generic status values */
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_GENERIC_OK 0
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_GENERIC_ERR 1
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_GENERIC_INVALID_CLASS 2
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_GENERIC_INVALID_COMMAND 3
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_GENERIC_DATA_TRANSFER_ERR 4
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_STATUS_GENERIC_DEVICE_INTERNAL_ERR 5
>> +\end{lstlisting}
This is very complex, and it feels like we're overengineering this.
>> +
>> +The \field{class}, \field{command} and \field{command-specific-data} are
>> +set by the driver, and the device sets the \field{status_type}, the
>> +\field{status} and the \field{command-specific-result}, if needed.
>> +
>> +The virtio Admin command class codes are divided in the following form:
>> +
>> +\begin{lstlisting}
>> +/* class values that are transport, device and vendor independent */
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_COMMON_CLASS_START 0
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_COMMON_CLASS_END 63
>> +
>> +/* class values that are transport specific */
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_TRANSPORT_CLASS_START 64
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_TRANSPORT_CLASS_END 127
>> +
>> +/* class values that are device specific */
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_CLASS_START 128
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_DEVICE_CLASS_END 191
>> +
>> +/* class values that are vendor specific */
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_VENDOR_CLASS_START 192
>> +#define VIRTIO_ADMIN_VENDOR_CLASS_END 255
>> +\end{lstlisting}
>> +
>> +\subsection{Admin command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues / Admin command set}
>> +
>> +Each virtio device that advertise VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ feature, MUST
>
> "advertises the VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ feature"
>
>> +support all the mandatory admin commands. A device MAY support also
>> +one or more optional admin commands.
>> +
>> +\subsubsection{Common command set}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues / Admin command set / Common command set}
>> +
>> +The Common command set is a group of classes and commands within each
>> +of these classes which are transport, device and vendor independent.
>> +A mandatory class is a class that has at least one mandatory command.
>> +The Common command set is summarized in following table:
>> +
>> +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
>> +\hline
>> +Class & Description & M/O \\
>> +\hline \hline
>> +0 & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DISCOVER_DEVICE & M \\
>> +\hline
>> +1 & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DISCOVER_DEVICE_CLASS_COMMANDS & M \\
>> +\hline
>> +2-63 & reserved & - \\
>> +\hline
>> +\end{tabular}
>> +
>> +\paragraph{Discover device class}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues / Admin command set / Common command set / Discover device class}
>> +
>> +This class (opcode: 0) of commands is used to query generic device
>> +information. The following table describes the commands supported for
>> +this class:
>> +
>> +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
>> +\hline
>> +Command & Description & M/O \\
>> +\hline \hline
>> +0 & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DISCOVER_DEVICE_IDENTITY & M \\
>> +\hline
>> +1 & VIRTIO_ADMIN_DISCOVER_DEVICE_SUPPORTED_CLASSES & M \\
>> +\hline
>> +2-255 & reserved & - \\
>> +\hline
>> +\end{tabular}
>> +
>> +\subparagraph{Device identity command}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Admin Virtqueues / Admin command set / Common command set / Discover device class / Device identity command}
>> +
>> +This mandatory command should return device identity in the following
>> +structure:
>> +
>> +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
>> +\hline
>> +Bytes & Description & M/O \\
>> +\hline \hline
>> +03:00 & VIRTIO DEVICE ID & M \\
>> +\hline
>> +05:04 & VIRTIO TRANSPORT ID & M \\
>
> These fields are not defined. I wonder why they are necessary - the
> driver should already have this information.
Agreed.
> In general, I'm a little concerned that this whole infrastructure will
> increase the complexity of VIRTIO significantly with little benefit. I
> do think an admin virtqueue makes sense, e.g. for migration, but would
> prefer it if we focus on actual commands first instead of
> infrastructure. That way it will be clear what infrastructure is needed.
A concrete example would be good, but I think we can come up with a
bare-bones spec to start with.
- feature bit for the admin vq, as defined here
- location of the admin vq is device specific
- I think we can get away with two classes, as for feature bits (not
device specificic and device specific); I don't think we need separate
classes for transport or vendor specific
- make the format for the request simple (command + length + payload?)
How many different (groups of) commands can we reasonably expect? Do we
need a generic discovery command, or can we get away with a feature bit
covering each new group of commands?
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-26 16:52 [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] Add virtio Admin Virtqueue specification Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-26 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-blk: add support for VIRTIO_F_ADMIN_VQ Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-27 12:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-27 16:08 ` [virtio-comment] " Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-28 8:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-27 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] Add virtio Admin Virtqueue specification Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-27 14:28 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-07-27 15:29 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-28 8:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-28 10:59 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-28 13:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-28 14:20 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-29 8:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-08-01 10:46 ` [virtio-comment] " Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 12:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-28 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-30 6:45 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-28 12:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-29 14:51 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-30 7:05 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-31 11:34 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-31 22:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-31 22:53 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-01 8:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-01 8:38 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 2:17 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-02 2:19 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-02 9:54 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 14:51 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-08-02 15:27 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 17:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-03 3:39 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-03 8:32 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-03 9:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-03 9:21 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-03 10:04 ` [virtio-comment] " Jason Wang
2021-07-30 7:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-31 11:53 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-07-31 22:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-31 23:46 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 13:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-08-02 14:34 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-08-02 14:58 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 16:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-08-02 15:21 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-08-02 16:03 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 17:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-03 6:28 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-08-03 6:41 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-03 6:51 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-08-03 7:55 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-03 8:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-03 9:04 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 2:25 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-02 9:51 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-02 17:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-03 3:22 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87im0v4yrj.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=aadam@redhat.com \
--cc=amikheev@nvidia.com \
--cc=bodong@nvidia.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=oren@nvidia.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox