From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, maxim.uvarov@linaro.org,
joakim.bech@linaro.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, arnd@linaro.org,
ruchika.gupta@linaro.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com,
yang.huang@intel.com, bing.zhu@intel.com,
Matti.Moell@opensynergy.com, hmo@opensynergy.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-rpmb: fix the description for multi-block reads
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 16:38:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnp2fshe.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czqw1cf2.fsf@redhat.com>
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 02 2021, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 22 2021, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Previously the text said we fail if block count is set to 1 despite
>>>> language elsewhere in the text referring to:
>>>>
>>>> "For RPMB read request, one virtio buffer including request command
>>>> and the subsequent [block_count] virtio buffers for response data
>>>> are placed in the queue."
>>>>
>>>> and the existence of both max_wr_cnt and max_rd_cnt configuration
>>>> variables certainly implying devices should be able to handle
>>>> multi-block reads just like writes.
>>>>
>>>> Fix the description as well as format the steps as an enumerated list
>>>> to match the style of the previous section describing write handling.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> virtio-rpmb.tex | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Do you want to request a vote for this?
>>
>> Sure - I think it's a clarification rather than a "new" feature but
>> whatever is needed to get it merged ;-)
>
> Yes, I think it is slightly over the line of things I would merge as an
> editorial update, so please open a github issue.
Done:
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/113
--
Alex Bennée
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-03 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-22 11:09 [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-rpmb: fix the description for multi-block reads Alex Bennée
2021-07-23 0:49 ` [virtio-comment] " Huang, Yang
2021-07-27 15:45 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2021-08-02 7:09 ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 8:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-08-03 15:38 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnp2fshe.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=Matti.Moell@opensynergy.com \
--cc=arnd@linaro.org \
--cc=bing.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=hmo@opensynergy.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=joakim.bech@linaro.org \
--cc=maxim.uvarov@linaro.org \
--cc=ruchika.gupta@linaro.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=yang.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox