Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	virtio@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [virtio] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] rework notifications terminology
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:44:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420184443-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf5ccd16-65dd-bcb1-27c9-650545d49a6c@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:53:24PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> ping
> 
> @Michael: Any feedback from you or should I prepare a non-rfc that
> deals with the other transports too.

Looks good to me pls go ahead.

> On 04/11/2018 12:11 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > While discussing XXXX using available and used buffer notifications
> 
> s;XXXX;'https://www.mail-archive.com/virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org/msg02774.html
> 
> > consistently for virqueue notifications (driver to device and vice versa
> > respectively) seemed like a good idea.
> > 
> > It turned out surprisingly invasive however, and I find it necessary to
> > confirm, this is really the path we want to walk, before investing even more
> > time.
> > 
> > This series limits itself to the core and to the ccw transport. It ain't
> > typical to the device types to make statements about notifications, but at
> > least net has some words on interrupts. I did not get these immediately so I've
> > left that out for now.
> > 
> > I choose ccw as demonstrator on how to bridge the abstract with the transport
> > specific, because that is the transport I'm most familiar with. I do not expect
> > difficulties with the other ones.
> > 
> > 
> > Halil Pasic (3):
> >    notifications: unify notifications wording in core
> >    notifications:notifications as basic virtio facility
> >    ccw: map common notifications terminology to ccw
> > 
> >   cl-os.tex       |    2 +-
> >   conformance.tex |    8 ++--
> >   content.tex     |   92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >   packed-ring.tex |   59 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >   split-ring.tex  |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >   5 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 


      reply	other threads:[~2018-04-20 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 22:11 [virtio] [RFC PATCH 0/3] rework notifications terminology Halil Pasic
2018-04-10 22:11 ` [virtio] [RFC PATCH 1/3] notifications: unify notifications wording in core Halil Pasic
2018-04-11  2:19   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-11 10:58     ` Halil Pasic
2018-04-11 11:47       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-11 12:35     ` [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] " Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-11 12:55       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-11 13:11         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-10 22:11 ` [virtio] [RFC PATCH 2/3] notifications:notifications as basic virtio facility Halil Pasic
2018-04-11 13:11   ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2018-04-10 22:11 ` [virtio] [RFC PATCH 3/3] ccw: map common notifications terminology to ccw Halil Pasic
2018-04-11  7:50   ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2018-04-11 13:42     ` [virtio] Re: [virtio-dev] " Halil Pasic
2018-04-11 16:00       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-12 11:12         ` Halil Pasic
2018-04-13  9:47           ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-20 14:53 ` [virtio] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] rework notifications terminology Halil Pasic
2018-04-20 15:44   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180420184443-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox