From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
"virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] virtio-net: Describe dev cfg fields read only
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:01:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87356yaxaz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221130713-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, Feb 21 2023, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 05:59:52PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>
>> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 12:52 PM
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 05:50:09PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> > > Hence, it should be mentioned as read-only fields, so when the driver writes
>> > something to read-only fields, it can be considered as undefined behavior on
>> > such fields.
>> > >
>> >
>> > In the description not in the normative statements. normative sections just tell
>> > driver what it must and must not do, in the standard RFC terms.
>> >
>> Got it.
>> I will shift them as read-only in the description section.
>> And normative in the device and driver section.
>> Device section:
>> Any writes to config space fields is ignored by the device, because these are read-only fields for the driver.
>
> writes is plural so "are ignored"
>
> but more importantly use rfc terms in normative sections.
I don't think you need to talk about "read-only" in the normative
sections (that belongs to the descriptive sections.) I'd use
"The device MUST ignore any writes to config space fields by the
driver."
>
>>
>> Driver section:
>> Driver must not write to read-only fields.
"The driver MUST NOT write to any config space field."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-22 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 15:45 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v3 0/2] virtio-net: Improve dev config layout Parav Pandit
2023-02-17 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] virtio-net: Describe dev cfg fields read only Parav Pandit
2023-02-20 14:46 ` [virtio-dev] " David Edmondson
2023-02-21 15:37 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2023-02-21 17:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-21 17:50 ` Parav Pandit
2023-02-21 17:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-21 17:59 ` Parav Pandit
2023-02-21 18:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-22 9:01 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2023-02-22 11:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-22 12:07 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2023-02-22 12:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-22 13:26 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2023-02-23 5:50 ` Parav Pandit
2023-02-17 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio-net: Define cfg fields before description Parav Pandit
2023-02-20 14:42 ` [virtio-comment] " David Edmondson
2023-02-21 13:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] virtio-net: Improve dev config layout Parav Pandit
[not found] ` <875ybej6hb.fsf@redhat.com>
2023-03-07 17:25 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-03-08 10:07 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87356yaxaz.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox