From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, eric.auger@redhat.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] virtio-iommu: Add VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:13:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDjmALQeAV/ldp9Q@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225140723-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 02:11:17PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:53:15PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > Specify the behavior of the device before feature negotiation.
> > Implementations that allow DMA to bypass the IOMMU during boot inform
> > the driver by setting the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS feature.
> > Negotiating the feature doesn't have any effect.
>
> from spec text it kind of looks like it does, after
> FEATURES_OK devices are disallowed access?
Before FEATURES_OK the BOOT_BYPASS feature defines the policy chosen by
the device implementation. After FEATURES_OK the driver overrides this
policy using the BYPASS feature.
Thinking more about this, we can't redefine F_BYPASS now (QEMU offers it),
but I'm tempted to deprecate it and replace it with a new feature bit that
indicates presence of a bypass field in config space. Device sets the byte
to 0 or 1 to declare its default bypass policy, and driver can override
this by writing 0 or 1 (currently done by accepting or refusing F_BYPASS).
It would be a lot cleaner than this.
Or just state that the boot-bypass behavior is up to the implementation
and leave it at that.
> > Clarify the description for VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS while we're at it,
> > because "downstream of the IOMMU" is confusing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
>
> are the two bypass features dependend on each other then?
No the device can offer one without the other.
Thanks,
Jean
>
> > ---
> > virtio-iommu.tex | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/virtio-iommu.tex b/virtio-iommu.tex
> > index 08b358a..4f34a14 100644
> > --- a/virtio-iommu.tex
> > +++ b/virtio-iommu.tex
> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Feature bits}
> > VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MAP_UNMAP is supported.}
> >
> > \item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS (3)]
> > - When not attached to a domain, endpoints downstream of the IOMMU
> > + When not attached to a domain, endpoints managed by the IOMMU
> > can access the guest-physical address space.
> >
> > \item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_PROBE (4)]
> > @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Feature bits}
> >
> > \item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MMIO (5)]
> > The VIRTIO_IOMMU_MAP_F_MMIO flag is available.
> > +
> > +\item[VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS (6)]
> > + Before feature negotiation, endpoints managed by the IOMMU
> > + can access the guest-physical address space.
> > \end{description}
> >
> > \drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Feature bits}{Device Types / IOMMU Device / Feature bits}
> > @@ -114,12 +118,15 @@ \subsection{Device initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Devic
> >
> > When the device is reset, endpoints are not attached to any domain.
> >
> > -If the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature is negotiated, all accesses from
> > -unattached endpoints are allowed and translated by the IOMMU using the
> > -identity function. If the feature is not negotiated, any memory access
> > -from an unattached endpoint fails. Upon attaching an endpoint in
> > -bypass mode to a new domain, any memory access from the endpoint fails,
> > -since the domain does not contain any mapping.
> > +Memory accesses from an endpoint bypass the IOMMU, that is all
> > +accesses are allowed and translated using the identity function,
> > +in the following cases:
> > +\begin{itemize}
> > +\item If the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS feature is offered and
> > + the FEATURES_OK status bit is not set.
>
> confused. so this feature *only* has effect before FEATURES_OK?
>
>
> > +\item If the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature is negotiated and the
> > + endpoint is not attached to a domain.
> > +\end{itemize}
> >
> > Future devices might support more modes of operation besides MAP/UNMAP.
> > Drivers verify that devices set VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_MAP_UNMAP and fail
> > @@ -136,8 +143,13 @@ \subsection{Device initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Devic
> >
> > \devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Initialization}{Device Types / IOMMU Device / Device Initialization}
> >
> > +If the device does not offer the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS
> > +feature, it SHOULD NOT let endpoints access the guest-physical
> > +address space before feature negotiation is complete.
> > +
> > If the driver does not accept the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature, the
> > -device SHOULD NOT let endpoints access the guest-physical address space.
> > +device SHOULD NOT let endpoints access the guest-physical address space
> > +after feature negotiation is complete.
>
>
> sounds weird as if they are only allowed access before feature
> negotiation. likely not what you meant.
>
>
> >
> > \subsection{Device operations}\label{sec:Device Types / IOMMU Device / Device operations}
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.1
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-26 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 17:53 [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-iommu: Add VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-25 19:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-26 12:13 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2021-03-22 14:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDjmALQeAV/ldp9Q@myrica \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox