* Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] dt-bindings: arm: Add virtio transport for SCMI
[not found] ` <20200918165558.257086-1-peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
@ 2020-09-23 20:54 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2020-09-23 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Hilber
Cc: devicetree, mikhail.golubev, souvik.chakravarty, igor.skalkin,
virtio-dev, Michael S. Tsirkin, linux-kernel, virtualization,
anton.yakovlev, sudeep.holla, jean-philippe, linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 06:55:58PM +0200, Peter Hilber wrote:
> From: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com>
>
> Document the properties for arm,scmi-virtio compatible nodes. The
> backing virtio SCMI device is described in patch [1].
>
> [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202005/msg00096.html
>
> Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 38 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> index 55deb68230eb..844ff3c40a49 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ the device tree.
> Required properties:
>
> The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node.
> +Some properties are specific to a transport type.
> +
> +shmem-based transports (mailbox, smc/hvc):
>
> - compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc" for smc/hvc transports
> - mboxes: List of phandle and mailbox channel specifiers. It should contain
> @@ -21,6 +24,17 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node.
> supported.
> - shmem : List of phandle pointing to the shared memory(SHM) area as per
> generic mailbox client binding.
> +
> +Virtio transport:
> +
> +- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi-virtio".
> +- virtio_transport : phandle of the virtio device. This device must support one
> + virtqueue for transmitting commands ("tx", cmdq), and,
> + optionally, one more virtqueue for receiving notifications
> + and delayed responses ("rx", eventq).
Isn't what the virtio device provides discoverable? We don't have virtio
protocols in DT for anything else. Why is SCMI special?
Rob
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread