* Re: [PATCH 1/2] vsock: remove the unused 'wait' in vsock_connectible_recvmsg() [not found] ` <20221028205646.28084-2-decui@microsoft.com> @ 2022-10-31 8:37 ` Stefano Garzarella 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2022-10-31 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dexuan Cui Cc: wei.liu, linux-hyperv, netdev, haiyangz, linux-kernel, virtualization, stephen, edumazet, kuba, arseny.krasnov, pabeni, davem On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 01:56:45PM -0700, Dexuan Cui wrote: >Remove the unused variable introduced by 19c1b90e1979. > >Fixes: 19c1b90e1979 ("af_vsock: separate receive data loop") >Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> >--- > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) Good catch! Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> > >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >index ee418701cdee..d258fd43092e 100644 >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >@@ -2092,8 +2092,6 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, > const struct vsock_transport *transport; > int err; > >- DEFINE_WAIT(wait); >- > sk = sock->sk; > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > err = 0; >-- >2.25.1 > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20221028205646.28084-3-decui@microsoft.com>]
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] vsock: fix possible infinite sleep in vsock_connectible_wait_data() [not found] ` <20221028205646.28084-3-decui@microsoft.com> @ 2022-10-31 8:43 ` Stefano Garzarella 2022-11-01 20:21 ` Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2022-10-31 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dexuan Cui Cc: wei.liu, linux-hyperv, netdev, haiyangz, linux-kernel, virtualization, stephen, edumazet, kuba, arseny.krasnov, pabeni, davem On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 01:56:46PM -0700, Dexuan Cui wrote: >Currently vsock_connectible_has_data() may miss a wakeup operation >between vsock_connectible_has_data() == 0 and the prepare_to_wait(). > >Fix the race by adding the process to the wait qeuue before checking s/qeuue/queue >vsock_connectible_has_data(). > >Fixes: b3f7fd54881b ("af_vsock: separate wait data loop") >Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> >--- > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >index d258fd43092e..03a6b5bc6ba7 100644 >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >@@ -1905,8 +1905,11 @@ static int vsock_connectible_wait_data(struct sock *sk, > err = 0; > transport = vsk->transport; > >- while ((data = vsock_connectible_has_data(vsk)) == 0) { >+ while (1) { > prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); >+ data = vsock_connectible_has_data(vsk); >+ if (data != 0) >+ break; > > if (sk->sk_err != 0 || > (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) || >@@ -1937,6 +1940,8 @@ static int vsock_connectible_wait_data(struct sock *sk, > err = -EAGAIN; > break; > } >+ >+ finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait); Since we are going to call again prepare_to_wait() on top of the loop, is finish_wait() call here really needed? What about following what we do in vsock_accept and vsock_connect? prepare_to_wait() while (condition) { ... prepare_to_wait(); } finish_wait() I find it a little more readable, but your solution is fine too. Thanks, Stefano _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] vsock: fix possible infinite sleep in vsock_connectible_wait_data() 2022-10-31 8:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] vsock: fix possible infinite sleep in vsock_connectible_wait_data() Stefano Garzarella @ 2022-11-01 20:21 ` Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization 2022-11-02 9:45 ` Stefano Garzarella 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization @ 2022-11-01 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: wei.liu, netdev, haiyangz, linux-hyperv, virtualization, stephen, edumazet, kuba, arseny.krasnov [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2436 bytes --] Hi Dexan, Stephano, This solution has been proposed here, https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2022-August/062656.html Best regards, Frédéric On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 9:43 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 01:56:46PM -0700, Dexuan Cui wrote: > >Currently vsock_connectible_has_data() may miss a wakeup operation > >between vsock_connectible_has_data() == 0 and the prepare_to_wait(). > > > >Fix the race by adding the process to the wait qeuue before checking > > s/qeuue/queue > > >vsock_connectible_has_data(). > > > >Fixes: b3f7fd54881b ("af_vsock: separate wait data loop") > >Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> > >--- > > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 7 ++++++- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > >index d258fd43092e..03a6b5bc6ba7 100644 > >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > >@@ -1905,8 +1905,11 @@ static int vsock_connectible_wait_data(struct sock > *sk, > > err = 0; > > transport = vsk->transport; > > > >- while ((data = vsock_connectible_has_data(vsk)) == 0) { > >+ while (1) { > > prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > >+ data = vsock_connectible_has_data(vsk); > >+ if (data != 0) > >+ break; > > > > if (sk->sk_err != 0 || > > (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) || > >@@ -1937,6 +1940,8 @@ static int vsock_connectible_wait_data(struct sock > *sk, > > err = -EAGAIN; > > break; > > } > >+ > >+ finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait); > > Since we are going to call again prepare_to_wait() on top of the loop, > is finish_wait() call here really needed? > > What about following what we do in vsock_accept and vsock_connect? > > prepare_to_wait() > > while (condition) { > ... > prepare_to_wait(); > } > > finish_wait() > > I find it a little more readable, but your solution is fine too. > > Thanks, > Stefano > > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization > [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3517 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] vsock: fix possible infinite sleep in vsock_connectible_wait_data() 2022-11-01 20:21 ` Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization @ 2022-11-02 9:45 ` Stefano Garzarella 2022-11-02 17:08 ` Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2022-11-02 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frederic Dalleau Cc: wei.liu, netdev, haiyangz, decui, linux-hyperv, virtualization, stephen, edumazet, kuba, arseny.krasnov On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 09:21:06PM +0100, Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization wrote: >Hi Dexan, Stephano, > >This solution has been proposed here, >https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2022-August/062656.html Ops, I missed it! Did you use scripts/get_maintainer.pl? https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#select-the-recipients-for-your-patch Since your patch should be reposted (hasn't been sent to netdev@vger.kernel.org, missing Fixes tag, etc.) and Dexuan's patch on the other hand is ready (I just reviewed it), can you test it and respond with your Tested-by? I would like to give credit to both, so I asked to add your Reported-by to the Dexuan's patch. Thanks, Stefano _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] vsock: fix possible infinite sleep in vsock_connectible_wait_data() 2022-11-02 9:45 ` Stefano Garzarella @ 2022-11-02 17:08 ` Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization @ 2022-11-02 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: wei.liu, netdev, haiyangz, decui, linux-hyperv, virtualization, stephen, edumazet, kuba, arseny.krasnov > Did you use scripts/get_maintainer.pl? Not really, I just picked the list that seemed narrow enough for the topic > respond with your Tested-by? Done > I would like to give credit to both, so I asked to add your Reported-by > to the Dexuan's patch. Thank you! Regards, Frédéric _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-02 17:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20221028205646.28084-1-decui@microsoft.com>
[not found] ` <20221028205646.28084-2-decui@microsoft.com>
2022-10-31 8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] vsock: remove the unused 'wait' in vsock_connectible_recvmsg() Stefano Garzarella
[not found] ` <20221028205646.28084-3-decui@microsoft.com>
2022-10-31 8:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] vsock: fix possible infinite sleep in vsock_connectible_wait_data() Stefano Garzarella
2022-11-01 20:21 ` Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization
2022-11-02 9:45 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-11-02 17:08 ` Frederic Dalleau via Virtualization
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox