* [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
@ 2026-06-12 15:54 William Bezenah
2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Bezenah @ 2026-06-12 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-s390
Cc: cohuck, pasic, farman, hca, gor, agordeev, borntraeger, svens,
mjrosato, vneethv, oberpar, virtualization, kvm, linux-kernel
When detaching virtio devices with multiple queues, spurious and
non-fatal error messages appear in the guest kernel log. While
virtio-net devices have multiple queues by default, this issue can
also be reproduced with other virtio device types (e.g., virtio-blk)
when configured with multiple queues:
[ 33.820621] virtio_ccw 0.0.0001: Failed to deregister indicators (-22)
[ 33.820628] virtio_net virtio2: Error -22 while deleting queue 0
[ 33.820632] virtio_net virtio2: Error -22 while deleting queue 1
[ 33.820634] virtio_net virtio2: Error -22 while deleting queue 2
Since commit 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the
subchannel based on DNV"), subchannel behavior following a device
detach has been updated and results in -EINVAL being propagated
rather than -ENODEV, originating from ccw_device_start_timeout_key()
in cio/device_ops. In the end, the virtio driver has no ability to
react to the difference between device and subchannel states here,
and during detach, both -ENODEV and -EINVAL indicate the device
cannot be used and should not be treated as errors requiring
attention. Update error handling in virtio_ccw_del_vq() and
virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() to suppress -EINVAL in addition to
-ENODEV.
Fixes: 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the subchannel based on DNV")
Signed-off-by: William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
index bab6cad3fd5c..02fd8bf7e469 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
vcdev->is_thinint ?
VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND_ADAPTER :
VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND);
- if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV))
+ if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV) && (ret != -EINVAL))
dev_info(&vcdev->cdev->dev,
"Failed to deregister indicators (%d)\n", ret);
else if (vcdev->is_thinint)
@@ -515,10 +515,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq, struct ccw1 *ccw)
ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw,
VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_VQ | index);
/*
- * -ENODEV isn't considered an error: The device is gone anyway.
+ * -ENODEV and -EINVAL aren't considered errors: The device is gone anyway.
* This may happen on device detach.
*/
- if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV))
+ if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV) && (ret != -EINVAL))
dev_warn(&vq->vdev->dev, "Error %d while deleting queue %d\n",
ret, index);
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
2026-06-12 15:54 [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach William Bezenah
@ 2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic
2026-06-15 14:58 ` Cornelia Huck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Halil Pasic @ 2026-06-14 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Bezenah
Cc: linux-s390, cohuck, farman, hca, gor, agordeev, borntraeger,
svens, mjrosato, vneethv, oberpar, virtualization, kvm,
linux-kernel, Halil Pasic
On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:54:07 +0200
William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Since commit 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the
> subchannel based on DNV"), subchannel behavior following a device
> detach has been updated and results in -EINVAL being propagated
> rather than -ENODEV, originating from ccw_device_start_timeout_key()
> in cio/device_ops. In the end, the virtio driver has no ability to
> react to the difference between device and subchannel states here,
> and during detach, both -ENODEV and -EINVAL indicate the device
> cannot be used and should not be treated as errors requiring
> attention. Update error handling in virtio_ccw_del_vq() and
> virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() to suppress -EINVAL in addition to
> -ENODEV.
Hi William!
Are you saying that ccw_device_start() started returning -EINVAL
since 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the subchannel based on
DNV")? Or did I somehow read the paragraph wrong?
The funcition ccw_device_start is documented to return:
* Returns:
* %0, if the operation was successful;
* -%EBUSY, if the device is busy, or status pending;
* -%EACCES, if no path specified in @lpm is operational;
* -%ENODEV, if the device is not operational.
and the commit message does not say a thing about introducing -EINVAL to
the mix.
Regards,
Halil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic
@ 2026-06-15 14:58 ` Cornelia Huck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cornelia Huck @ 2026-06-15 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Halil Pasic, William Bezenah
Cc: linux-s390, farman, hca, gor, agordeev, borntraeger, svens,
mjrosato, vneethv, oberpar, virtualization, kvm, linux-kernel,
Halil Pasic
On Mon, Jun 15 2026, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:54:07 +0200
> William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Since commit 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the
>> subchannel based on DNV"), subchannel behavior following a device
>> detach has been updated and results in -EINVAL being propagated
>> rather than -ENODEV, originating from ccw_device_start_timeout_key()
>> in cio/device_ops. In the end, the virtio driver has no ability to
>> react to the difference between device and subchannel states here,
>> and during detach, both -ENODEV and -EINVAL indicate the device
>> cannot be used and should not be treated as errors requiring
>> attention. Update error handling in virtio_ccw_del_vq() and
>> virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() to suppress -EINVAL in addition to
>> -ENODEV.
>
> Hi William!
>
> Are you saying that ccw_device_start() started returning -EINVAL
> since 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the subchannel based on
> DNV")? Or did I somehow read the paragraph wrong?
>
> The funcition ccw_device_start is documented to return:
> * Returns:
> * %0, if the operation was successful;
> * -%EBUSY, if the device is busy, or status pending;
> * -%EACCES, if no path specified in @lpm is operational;
> * -%ENODEV, if the device is not operational.
> and the commit message does not say a thing about introducing -EINVAL to
> the mix.
The function may return -EINVAL for non-enabled subchannels
(i.e. pmcw.ena == 0), maybe we get an all-zeroes schib with dnv == 0?
I'd expect it not to be enabled in that case anyway.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-15 14:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-12 15:54 [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach William Bezenah
2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic
2026-06-15 14:58 ` Cornelia Huck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox