From: me@berkoc.com
To: security@kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, berkantkoc@proton.me
Subject: [Hardening] drm/qxl: apply_reloc/apply_surf_reloc write dst_offset without validating against BO size
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 02:07:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36acd33982bfdce04090e17294596ff8@berkoc.com> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5425 bytes --]
# QXL DRM: `apply_reloc` and `apply_surf_reloc` write to `info->dst_offset` without validating against BO size
## Summary
The QXL DRM driver's relocation processing in `drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c` writes 64-bit and 32-bit values to `reloc_page + (info->dst_offset & ~PAGE_MASK)` after mapping `info->dst_offset & PAGE_MASK` into kernel space via `qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page`. The `dst_offset` is taken verbatim from the user-supplied `drm_qxl_reloc` ioctl argument and is never validated against the destination buffer object's size before the write.
An aspirational comment at the top of `apply_reloc` explicitly notes that "`dst` must be validated, i.e. whole bo on vram/surfacesram", but the validation has not been implemented since the driver was introduced in 2013.
## Impact
This is **not** a host-VM-escape primitive (the writes hit guest-controlled VRAM emulated by QEMU, not host kernel memory). It is a **guest-side memory corruption** primitive:
- A guest userspace process with `DRM_AUTH` (any logged-in user) can write attacker-chosen 64-bit/32-bit values to arbitrary offsets within the QXL VRAM aperture.
- Targets reachable within the aperture include other guest processes' QXL buffer objects, QXL release-command BOs queued for the host, and ring buffers that QEMU consumes.
- Corrupting QXL command structures that QEMU/SPICE then parses **moves the attack surface** to QEMU's QXL parser (separate codebase; historically vulnerable). This kernel bug is therefore a viable priming primitive for a guest-to-host escape chain whose terminal step lives in QEMU.
CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write). Realistic CVSS 3.1: `AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H` ≈ **5.5 Medium** for the kernel-side bug in isolation. If chained with a QEMU QXL parser bug: higher.
This is submitted as **hardening / defense-in-depth**, not as a self-contained RCE/VM-escape claim.
## Affected versions
Linux mainline HEAD (audited 2026-05-13). The pattern is unchanged since the QXL DRM driver merged in v3.10 (2013). Commit history is sparse on this file; the issue is structural.
## Vulnerable code
`drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c:73-110`:
```c
struct qxl_reloc_info {
int type;
struct qxl_bo *dst_bo;
uint32_t dst_offset; /* <-- user-controlled, copied from drm_qxl_reloc.dst_offset (__u64) */
struct qxl_bo *src_bo;
int src_offset;
};
/*
* dst must be validated, i.e. whole bo on vram/surfacesram (right now all bo's
* are on vram).
* *(dst + dst_off) = qxl_bo_physical_address(src, src_off)
*/
static void
apply_reloc(struct qxl_device *qdev, struct qxl_reloc_info *info)
{
void *reloc_page;
reloc_page = qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page(qdev, info->dst_bo,
info->dst_offset & PAGE_MASK);
*(uint64_t *)(reloc_page + (info->dst_offset & ~PAGE_MASK)) =
qxl_bo_physical_address(qdev, info->src_bo, info->src_offset);
qxl_bo_kunmap_atomic_page(qdev, info->dst_bo, reloc_page);
}
```
`apply_surf_reloc` (Lines 98-110) has the identical pattern for a `uint32_t` write.
### How `dst_offset` reaches `apply_reloc`
The user-space struct is defined in `include/uapi/drm/qxl_drm.h`:
```c
struct drm_qxl_reloc {
__u64 src_offset;
__u64 dst_offset; /* user-controlled */
__u32 src_handle;
__u32 dst_handle;
__u32 reloc_type;
__u32 pad;
};
```
`qxl_process_single_command` (`qxl_ioctl.c:141-269`) copies the user `drm_qxl_reloc` array into `reloc_info`, narrows `dst_offset` from `__u64` to `uint32_t` (silent truncation -- still gives the attacker the full 32-bit / 4 GB range), and then calls `apply_reloc`/`apply_surf_reloc`. No bounds check against `dst_bo->tbo.base.size` exists anywhere in the call chain. `qxl_release_reserve_list` only handles TTM placement validation.
### Mapping behaviour
`qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page` (`drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c`) computes `offset = (bo->tbo.resource->start << PAGE_SHIFT) + page_offset` and maps via `io_mapping_map_atomic_wc` on the QXL device's full VRAM aperture (`vram_mapping`). The `BUG_ON(offset >= mapping->size)` inside `io_mapping_map_atomic_wc` (see `include/linux/io-mapping.h`) only fires if the offset exceeds the *entire* aperture, not the specific BO. Writes within the aperture but outside the BO succeed and land on whatever data occupies those pages.
## Proposed fix
Add the validation the comment promised, in the per-reloc-info-fill loop in `qxl_process_single_command` (around line 228-244):
```c
+ if (reloc_info[i].type == QXL_RELOC_TYPE_BO &&
+ (reloc_info[i].dst_offset + sizeof(uint64_t) > reloc_info[i].dst_bo->tbo.base.size ||
+ reloc_info[i].dst_offset > U32_MAX - sizeof(uint64_t))) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_free_bos;
+ }
+ if (reloc_info[i].type == QXL_RELOC_TYPE_SURF &&
+ (reloc_info[i].dst_offset + sizeof(uint32_t) > reloc_info[i].dst_bo->tbo.base.size ||
+ reloc_info[i].dst_offset > U32_MAX - sizeof(uint32_t))) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_free_bos;
+ }
```
Equivalent to checking `dst_offset` plus the write size fits inside the resolved BO. Also enforce a reasonable upper bound on `cmd->relocs_num` to prevent allocation DoS.
## Discovery
Static analysis of QXL DRM ioctl handlers.
## Disclosure
Per Linux kernel security policy, report to `security@kernel.org` and the QXL maintainers (Gerd Hoffmann, virtualization@lists.linux.dev).
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 0:07 me [this message]
2026-05-14 4:57 ` [Hardening] drm/qxl: apply_reloc/apply_surf_reloc write dst_offset without validating against BO size Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36acd33982bfdce04090e17294596ff8@berkoc.com \
--to=me@berkoc.com \
--cc=berkantkoc@proton.me \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox