From: Petr Mladek via Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: "Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)" <sforshee@digitalocean.com>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Seth Forshee \(DigitalOcean\)" <sforshee@kernel.org>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: check for pending livepatches from vhost worker kthreads
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:17:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8/ohzRGcOiqsh69@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120-vhost-klp-switching-v1-2-7c2b65519c43@kernel.org>
On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:22, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote:
> Livepatch relies on stack checking of sleeping tasks to switch kthreads,
> so a busy kthread can block a livepatch transition indefinitely. We've
> seen this happen fairly often with busy vhost kthreads.
To be precise, it would be "indefinitely" only when the kthread never
sleeps.
But yes. I believe that the problem is real. It might be almost
impossible to livepatch some busy kthreads, especially when they
have a dedicated CPU.
> Add a check to call klp_switch_current() from vhost_worker() when a
> livepatch is pending. In testing this allowed vhost kthreads to switch
> immediately when they had previously blocked livepatch transitions for
> long periods of time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) <sforshee@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index cbe72bfd2f1f..d8624f1f2d64 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -366,6 +367,9 @@ static int vhost_worker(void *data)
> if (need_resched())
> schedule();
> }
> +
> + if (unlikely(klp_patch_pending(current)))
> + klp_switch_current();
I suggest to use the following intead:
if (unlikely(klp_patch_pending(current)))
klp_update_patch_state(current);
We already use this in do_idle(). The reason is basically the same.
It is almost impossible to livepatch the idle task when a CPU is
very idle.
klp_update_patch_state(current) does not check the stack.
It switches the task immediately.
It should be safe because the kthread never leaves vhost_worker().
It means that the same kthread could never re-enter this function
and use the new code.
Best Regards,
Petr
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230120-vhost-klp-switching-v1-0-7c2b65519c43@kernel.org>
2023-01-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily loaded vhost worker kthreads Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20230120-vhost-klp-switching-v1-2-7c2b65519c43@kernel.org>
2023-01-24 14:17 ` Petr Mladek via Virtualization [this message]
[not found] ` <Y9ATo5FukOhphwqT@do-x1extreme>
2023-01-25 11:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] vhost: check for pending livepatches from " Petr Mladek via Virtualization
[not found] ` <Y9FfenH/p3qzRlar@do-x1extreme>
2023-01-26 11:16 ` Petr Mladek via Virtualization
2023-01-26 11:49 ` Petr Mladek via Virtualization
2023-01-26 17:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily loaded " Petr Mladek via Virtualization
[not found] ` <Y9LswwnPAf+nOVFG@do-x1extreme>
[not found] ` <20230127044355.frggdswx424kd5dq@treble>
2023-01-27 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 12:09 ` Petr Mladek via Virtualization
[not found] ` <20230127165236.rjcp6jm6csdta6z3@treble>
[not found] ` <20230127170946.zey6xbr4sm4kvh3x@treble>
[not found] ` <20230127221131.sdneyrlxxhc4h3fa@treble>
2023-01-30 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-30 18:36 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20230130194823.6y3rc227bvsgele4@treble>
2023-01-31 10:22 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20230131163832.z46ihurbmjcwuvck@treble>
2023-02-01 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20230201165727.lnywx6zyefbqbrke@treble>
2023-02-01 17:11 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20230130195930.s5iu76e56j4q5bra@treble>
2023-01-31 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 11:19 ` Petr Mladek via Virtualization
[not found] ` <Y9PmZFBEwUBwV3s/@do-x1extreme>
2023-01-30 9:55 ` Petr Mladek via Virtualization
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8/ohzRGcOiqsh69@alley \
--to=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sforshee@digitalocean.com \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox