* question about vdpa_mgmt_dev
@ 2021-11-15 5:52 Liu,Feng(INF)
2021-11-15 6:31 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Liu,Feng(INF) @ 2021-11-15 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Hi Experts
I have read the upstream code about vdpa, and I notice that there is a new struct vdpa_mgmt_dev have been added.
Every driver implements dev_add() interface, such as mlx5 use mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(). This interface completes the creation of the vdpa device, hardware initialization and system registration. And I found that only netlink will call the dev_add() interface, in vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_add_set_doit(). While the probe() function just register vdpa_mgmt_dev without call dev_add()
So, my questions are:
Does it create a vdpa device only through the netlink interface? The system scans the PCI device and does not automatically create the corresponding vdpa device?
Thanks
Feng
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: question about vdpa_mgmt_dev
2021-11-15 5:52 question about vdpa_mgmt_dev Liu,Feng(INF)
@ 2021-11-15 6:31 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-15 6:58 ` 答复: " Liu,Feng(INF)
2021-11-15 7:02 ` Liu,Feng(INF)
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2021-11-15 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu,Feng(INF); +Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:08 PM Liu,Feng(INF) <liufeng32@baidu.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Experts
> I have read the upstream code about vdpa, and I notice that there is a new struct vdpa_mgmt_dev have been added.
> Every driver implements dev_add() interface, such as mlx5 use mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(). This interface completes the creation of the vdpa device, hardware initialization and system registration. And I found that only netlink will call the dev_add() interface, in vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_add_set_doit(). While the probe() function just register vdpa_mgmt_dev without call dev_add()
> So, my questions are:
> Does it create a vdpa device only through the netlink interface?
Yes, this is the plan, and we're working on converting all the drivers
to support that.
> The system scans the PCI device and does not automatically create the corresponding vdpa device?
It's a choice for the vDPA parent driver but we suggest creating vDPA
via netlink(), this gives a persistent method for the management
layer.
Thanks
>
>
> Thanks
> Feng
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* 答复: question about vdpa_mgmt_dev
2021-11-15 6:31 ` Jason Wang
@ 2021-11-15 6:58 ` Liu,Feng(INF)
2021-11-15 7:02 ` Liu,Feng(INF)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Liu,Feng(INF) @ 2021-11-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang; +Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Jason
Thanks for your comments
Thanks
Feng
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> 发送时间: 2021年11月15日 14:31
> 收件人: Liu,Feng(INF) <liufeng32@baidu.com>
> 抄送: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> 主题: Re: question about vdpa_mgmt_dev
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:08 PM Liu,Feng(INF) <liufeng32@baidu.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Experts
> > I have read the upstream code about vdpa, and I notice that
> there is a new struct vdpa_mgmt_dev have been added.
> > Every driver implements dev_add() interface, such as mlx5 use
> mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(). This interface completes the creation of the vdpa
> device, hardware initialization and system registration. And I found that only
> netlink will call the dev_add() interface, in vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_add_set_doit().
> While the probe() function just register vdpa_mgmt_dev without call
> dev_add()
> > So, my questions are:
> > Does it create a vdpa device only through the netlink interface?
>
> Yes, this is the plan, and we're working on converting all the drivers to
> support that.
>
> > The system scans the PCI device and does not automatically create the
> corresponding vdpa device?
>
> It's a choice for the vDPA parent driver but we suggest creating vDPA via
> netlink(), this gives a persistent method for the management layer.
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Feng
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* 答复: question about vdpa_mgmt_dev
2021-11-15 6:31 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-15 6:58 ` 答复: " Liu,Feng(INF)
@ 2021-11-15 7:02 ` Liu,Feng(INF)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Liu,Feng(INF) @ 2021-11-15 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang; +Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Jason
It's clear, thanks for your comments
Thanks
Feng
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> 发送时间: 2021年11月15日 14:31
> 收件人: Liu,Feng(INF) <liufeng32@baidu.com>
> 抄送: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> 主题: Re: question about vdpa_mgmt_dev
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:08 PM Liu,Feng(INF) <liufeng32@baidu.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Experts
> > I have read the upstream code about vdpa, and I notice that
> there is a new struct vdpa_mgmt_dev have been added.
> > Every driver implements dev_add() interface, such as mlx5 use
> mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(). This interface completes the creation of the vdpa
> device, hardware initialization and system registration. And I found that only
> netlink will call the dev_add() interface, in vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_add_set_doit().
> While the probe() function just register vdpa_mgmt_dev without call
> dev_add()
> > So, my questions are:
> > Does it create a vdpa device only through the netlink interface?
>
> Yes, this is the plan, and we're working on converting all the drivers to
> support that.
>
> > The system scans the PCI device and does not automatically create the
> corresponding vdpa device?
>
> It's a choice for the vDPA parent driver but we suggest creating vDPA via
> netlink(), this gives a persistent method for the management layer.
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Feng
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-15 7:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-15 5:52 question about vdpa_mgmt_dev Liu,Feng(INF)
2021-11-15 6:31 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-15 6:58 ` 答复: " Liu,Feng(INF)
2021-11-15 7:02 ` Liu,Feng(INF)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox