* are there any actual "container layers" left?
@ 2025-06-16 12:49 Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2025-06-16 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YP docs mailing list
perusing the BSP developer's guide:
https://docs.yoctoproject.org/bsp-guide/bsp.html
and early on, there is a reference to "container layers," which i
remember because i recall bringing up the issue of how to refer to OE
layers that were themselves layers while containing even *more* layers
as subdirectories.
first, since this is the BSP guide, it's a bit weird to use
meta-openembedded as an alleged example of a container layer. but
that's not the issue.
as i recall, the phrase "container layer" was meant to describe
something which was itself a valid layer, while containing further
valid layers; if memory serves, "meta-intel" used to look like that.
but that's not what it looks like anymore, it's just a regular layer:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel/tree/
as another example, the "meta-xilinx" checkout clearly fetches
numerous layers, but it itself is not a layer, so it doesn't fit the
definition of a "container layer".
is this terminology still useful? and under what circumstances?
rday
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-06-16 12:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-16 12:49 are there any actual "container layers" left? Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox