any interest in a YP riscv mailing list?

any interest in a YP riscv mailing list?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
that risc-v have its own mailing list?

rday

Re: [yocto] any interest in a YP riscv mailing list?

[Khem Raj]

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 7:25 AM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
>
>   given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
> that risc-v have its own mailing list?

We do not have generic architecture specific layers, existing mailing
lists should suffice for that matter.
I think you are referring to BSP layer specific mailing list they also
happen to main proponents of architecture,
these are member maintained layers.

>
> rday
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> You automatically follow any topics you start or reply to.
> View/Reply Online (#61333): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/61333
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/101940855/1997914
> Group Owner: yocto+owner@lists.yoctoproject.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [raj.khem@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

Re: [yocto] any interest in a YP riscv mailing list?

[Ross Burton]

On 13 Oct 2023, at 15:20, Robert P. J. Day via lists.yoctoproject.org <rpjday=crashcourse.ca@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
>  given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
> that risc-v have its own mailing list?

meta-arm, meta-intel etc are primarily because they take patches via the mailing list.

meta-riscv (https://github.com/riscv/meta-riscv) does pull requests and issues via GitHub.  If the yocto@ list ended up getting swamped with riscv-specific discussion then there’s be a case for creating a list, but architecture-specific discussion is rare.

Ross

Re: [yocto] any interest in a YP riscv mailing list?

[rpjday]

On 2023-10-13 11:14, Ross Burton wrote:
> On 13 Oct 2023, at 15:20, Robert P. J. Day via lists.yoctoproject.org 
> <rpjday=crashcourse.ca@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
>>  given that other acrhitectures have their own ML, is it reasonable
>> that risc-v have its own mailing list?
> 
> meta-arm, meta-intel etc are primarily because they take patches via 
> the mailing list.
> 
> meta-riscv (https://github.com/riscv/meta-riscv) does pull requests and 
> issues via GitHub.  If the yocto@ list ended up getting swamped with 
> riscv-specific discussion then there’s be a case for creating a list, 
> but architecture-specific discussion is rare.

understood.

rday