RE: [PATCH v3 05/10] pinctrl: samsung: Add ARTPEC-8 SoC specific configuration

["Ravi Patel" <ravi.patel@samsung.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 29 August 2025 15:59
> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>; Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com>
> Cc: jesper.nilsson@axis.com; mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> s.nawrocki@samsung.com; cw00.choi@samsung.com; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; tomasz.figa@gmail.com; catalin.marinas@arm.com;
> will@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; ksk4725@coasia.com; kenkim@coasia.com; pjsin865@coasia.com; gwk1013@coasia.com;
> hgkim05@coasia.com; mingyoungbo@coasia.com; smn1196@coasia.com; pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; shradha.t@samsung.com;
> inbaraj.e@samsung.com; swathi.ks@samsung.com; hrishikesh.d@samsung.com; dj76.yang@samsung.com; hypmean.kim@samsung.com;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@axis.com;
> linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; soc@lists.linux.dev; Priyadarsini G
> <priya.ganesh@samsung.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] pinctrl: samsung: Add ARTPEC-8 SoC specific configuration
> 
> On 29/08/2025 12:11, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Hi Ravi / SeonGu,
> >
> > thanks for your patch!
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 2:07 PM Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com>
> >>
> >> Add Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC specific configuration data to enable pinctrl.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@coasia.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Priyadarsini G <priya.ganesh@samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@samsung.com>
> >
> > Please avoid CC to soc@kernel.org on these patches, they end up in the
> > patchwork for immediate merging for SoC:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/patch/20250825114436.46882-6-ravi.patel@samsung.com/
> 
> Yeah, that's odd - most likely old CC-list. This could happen if using
> b4 but there is no b4 being used here, so why Cc-ing according to some
> old files?
> 
> >
> > I think this is not you intention, the pinctrl portions will be merged by
> > Krzysztof who sends it to me once that part is finished reviewing.
> Version for review should not be merged via soc@, so that's wrong
> process in any case. But you are right that I will be taking everything,
> thus soc@ is not involved at all.

Ok, I will remove soc@ while sending next version.

Thanks,
Ravi

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof