From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:26:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003001ceebd9$07157380$15405a80$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385540365.2417.28.camel@kjgkr>
Hi Kim,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 4:19 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
>
> Hi,
>
> 2013-11-27 (수), 15:58 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > Hi Kim,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:30 PM
> > > To: Chao Yu
> > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; 谭姝
> > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > >
> > > Hi Chao,
> > >
> > > It seems that we already have a readahed function for node pages,
> > > ra_node_page().
> > > So, we don't make a page list for this, but can use the node_inode's
> > > page cache.
> >
> > So you mean it's waste to release page list with updated data after we
> > finish work in restore_node_summary, right?
>
> Right.
So how about add all pages of page list to node_inode's address space by
add_to_page_cache_lru() with arg sum_entry->nid?
>
> >
> > >
> > > So how about writing ra_node_pages() which use the node_inode's page
> > > cache?
> >
> > Hmm, so ra_node_pages is introduced for read node_inode's pages which are
> > logical contiguously? and it also could take place of ra_node_page?
>
> Ah. The ra_node_page() read a node page ahead for a given node id.
> So it doesn't match exactly between ra_node_page() and ra_node_pages()
> that I suggested.
> So how about reading node pages and then caching some of them in the
> page cache, node_inode's address space?
Got it,
If we do not use the method above, we should search the NAT for nid number
as the index of node_inode's page by the specified node page blkaddr, that costs
a lot.
How do you think?
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > 2013-11-22 (금), 15:48 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > If cp has no CP_UMOUNT_FLAG, we will read all pages in whole node segment
> > > > one by one, it makes low performance. So let's merge contiguous pages and
> > > > readahead for better performance.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/f2fs/node.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > index 4ac4150..81e704a 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > @@ -1572,47 +1572,84 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * ra_sum_pages() merge contiguous pages into one bio and submit.
> > > > + * these pre-readed pages are linked in pages list.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
> > > > + int start, int nrpages)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct page *page;
> > > > + int page_idx = start;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (; page_idx < start + nrpages; page_idx++) {
> > > > + /* alloc temporal page for read node summary info*/
> > > > + page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > + if (!page) {
> > > > + struct page *tmp;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, pages, lru) {
> > > > + list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > + unlock_page(page);
> > > > + __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > + }
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + lock_page(page);
> > > > + page->index = page_idx;
> > > > + list_add_tail(&page->lru, pages);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(page, pages, lru)
> > > > + submit_read_page(sbi, page, page->index, READ_SYNC);
> > > > +
> > > > + f2fs_submit_read_bio(sbi, READ_SYNC);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum)
> > > > {
> > > > struct f2fs_node *rn;
> > > > struct f2fs_summary *sum_entry;
> > > > - struct page *page;
> > > > + struct page *page, *tmp;
> > > > block_t addr;
> > > > - int i, last_offset;
> > > > -
> > > > - /* alloc temporal page for read node */
> > > > - page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > - if (!page)
> > > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > > - lock_page(page);
> > > > + int bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
> > > > + int i, last_offset, nrpages, err = 0;
> > > > + LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> > > >
> > > > /* scan the node segment */
> > > > last_offset = sbi->blocks_per_seg;
> > > > addr = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno);
> > > > sum_entry = &sum->entries[0];
> > > >
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i++, sum_entry++) {
> > > > - /*
> > > > - * In order to read next node page,
> > > > - * we must clear PageUptodate flag.
> > > > - */
> > > > - ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i += nrpages, addr += nrpages) {
> > > >
> > > > - if (f2fs_readpage(sbi, page, addr, READ_SYNC))
> > > > - goto out;
> > > > + nrpages = min(last_offset - i, bio_blocks);
> > > > + /* read ahead node pages */
> > > > + err = ra_sum_pages(sbi, &page_list, addr, nrpages);
> > > > + if (err)
> > > > + return err;
> > > >
> > > > - lock_page(page);
> > > > - rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > - sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > - sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > - sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > - addr++;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
> > > > +
> > > > + lock_page(page);
> > > > + if(PageUptodate(page)) {
> > > > + rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > + sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > + sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > + sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > + sum_entry++;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + err = -EIO;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > + unlock_page(page);
> > > > + __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > > - unlock_page(page);
> > > > -out:
> > > > - __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > + return err;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static bool flush_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Samsung
> >
>
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
'谭姝' <shu.tan@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:26:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003001ceebd9$07157380$15405a80$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385540365.2417.28.camel@kjgkr>
Hi Kim,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 4:19 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
>
> Hi,
>
> 2013-11-27 (수), 15:58 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > Hi Kim,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:30 PM
> > > To: Chao Yu
> > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; 谭姝
> > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > >
> > > Hi Chao,
> > >
> > > It seems that we already have a readahed function for node pages,
> > > ra_node_page().
> > > So, we don't make a page list for this, but can use the node_inode's
> > > page cache.
> >
> > So you mean it's waste to release page list with updated data after we
> > finish work in restore_node_summary, right?
>
> Right.
So how about add all pages of page list to node_inode's address space by
add_to_page_cache_lru() with arg sum_entry->nid?
>
> >
> > >
> > > So how about writing ra_node_pages() which use the node_inode's page
> > > cache?
> >
> > Hmm, so ra_node_pages is introduced for read node_inode's pages which are
> > logical contiguously? and it also could take place of ra_node_page?
>
> Ah. The ra_node_page() read a node page ahead for a given node id.
> So it doesn't match exactly between ra_node_page() and ra_node_pages()
> that I suggested.
> So how about reading node pages and then caching some of them in the
> page cache, node_inode's address space?
Got it,
If we do not use the method above, we should search the NAT for nid number
as the index of node_inode's page by the specified node page blkaddr, that costs
a lot.
How do you think?
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > 2013-11-22 (금), 15:48 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > If cp has no CP_UMOUNT_FLAG, we will read all pages in whole node segment
> > > > one by one, it makes low performance. So let's merge contiguous pages and
> > > > readahead for better performance.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/f2fs/node.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > index 4ac4150..81e704a 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > @@ -1572,47 +1572,84 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * ra_sum_pages() merge contiguous pages into one bio and submit.
> > > > + * these pre-readed pages are linked in pages list.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
> > > > + int start, int nrpages)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct page *page;
> > > > + int page_idx = start;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (; page_idx < start + nrpages; page_idx++) {
> > > > + /* alloc temporal page for read node summary info*/
> > > > + page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > + if (!page) {
> > > > + struct page *tmp;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, pages, lru) {
> > > > + list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > + unlock_page(page);
> > > > + __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > + }
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + lock_page(page);
> > > > + page->index = page_idx;
> > > > + list_add_tail(&page->lru, pages);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(page, pages, lru)
> > > > + submit_read_page(sbi, page, page->index, READ_SYNC);
> > > > +
> > > > + f2fs_submit_read_bio(sbi, READ_SYNC);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum)
> > > > {
> > > > struct f2fs_node *rn;
> > > > struct f2fs_summary *sum_entry;
> > > > - struct page *page;
> > > > + struct page *page, *tmp;
> > > > block_t addr;
> > > > - int i, last_offset;
> > > > -
> > > > - /* alloc temporal page for read node */
> > > > - page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > - if (!page)
> > > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > > - lock_page(page);
> > > > + int bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
> > > > + int i, last_offset, nrpages, err = 0;
> > > > + LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> > > >
> > > > /* scan the node segment */
> > > > last_offset = sbi->blocks_per_seg;
> > > > addr = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno);
> > > > sum_entry = &sum->entries[0];
> > > >
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i++, sum_entry++) {
> > > > - /*
> > > > - * In order to read next node page,
> > > > - * we must clear PageUptodate flag.
> > > > - */
> > > > - ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i += nrpages, addr += nrpages) {
> > > >
> > > > - if (f2fs_readpage(sbi, page, addr, READ_SYNC))
> > > > - goto out;
> > > > + nrpages = min(last_offset - i, bio_blocks);
> > > > + /* read ahead node pages */
> > > > + err = ra_sum_pages(sbi, &page_list, addr, nrpages);
> > > > + if (err)
> > > > + return err;
> > > >
> > > > - lock_page(page);
> > > > - rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > - sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > - sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > - sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > - addr++;
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
> > > > +
> > > > + lock_page(page);
> > > > + if(PageUptodate(page)) {
> > > > + rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > + sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > + sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > + sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > + sum_entry++;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + err = -EIO;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > + unlock_page(page);
> > > > + __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > > - unlock_page(page);
> > > > -out:
> > > > - __free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > + return err;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static bool flush_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Samsung
> >
>
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-28 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 7:48 [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary Chao Yu
2013-11-22 7:48 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2013-11-27 5:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-27 5:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-27 7:58 ` Chao Yu
2013-11-27 7:58 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2013-11-27 8:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-27 8:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-28 1:26 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2013-11-28 1:26 ` Chao Yu
2013-11-28 3:33 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-28 5:56 ` Chao Yu
2013-11-28 5:56 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2013-11-30 5:12 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003001ceebd9$07157380$15405a80$@samsung.com' \
--to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
--cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.