All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:56:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003101ceebfe$bab50890$301f19b0$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385609608.2417.38.camel@kjgkr>

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:33 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 2013-11-28 (목), 09:26 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > Hi Kim,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 4:19 PM
> > > To: Chao Yu
> > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> > > Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2013-11-27 (수), 15:58 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > Hi Kim,
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:30 PM
> > > > > To: Chao Yu
> > > > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; 谭姝
> > > > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Chao,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that we already have a readahed function for node pages,
> > > > > ra_node_page().
> > > > > So, we don't make a page list for this, but can use the node_inode's
> > > > > page cache.
> > > >
> > > > So you mean it's waste to release page list with updated data after we
> > > > finish work in restore_node_summary, right?
> > >
> > > Right.
> >
> > So how about add all pages of page list to node_inode's address space by
> > add_to_page_cache_lru() with arg sum_entry->nid?
> 
> I don't think it's proper way to use add_to_page_cache_lru() directly.

This is the way used in VM readahead(i.e. read_pages/mpage_readpages/
read_cache_pages).
So what you worry about is that using lonely add_to_page_cache_lru()
may cause exception, is it?

> 
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So how about writing ra_node_pages() which use the node_inode's page
> > > > > cache?
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, so ra_node_pages is introduced for read node_inode's pages which are
> > > > logical contiguously? and it also could take place of ra_node_page?
> > >
> > > Ah. The ra_node_page() read a node page ahead for a given node id.
> > > So it doesn't match exactly between ra_node_page() and ra_node_pages()
> > > that I suggested.
> > > So how about reading node pages and then caching some of them in the
> > > page cache, node_inode's address space?
> >
> > Got it,
> > If we do not use the method above, we should search the NAT for nid number
> > as the index of node_inode's page by the specified node page blkaddr, that costs
> > a lot.
> > How do you think?
> 
> 1. grab_cache_page(node_footer->nid);
> 2. memcpy();
> 3. SetPageUptodate();
> 4. f2fs_put_page();

It could be.

This make ra_node_pages() synchronized, because we should read node_footer->nid
from updated node page before we cache node pages, and we will still use page list to
pass the updated page.

Why not introduce f2fs_cache_node_pages() include your code to cache node pages after
ra_node_pages()?

Thanks,
Yu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013-11-22 (금), 15:48 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > > > If cp has no CP_UMOUNT_FLAG, we will read all pages in whole node segment
> > > > > > one by one, it makes low performance. So let's merge contiguous pages and
> > > > > > readahead for better performance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  fs/f2fs/node.c |   89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > index 4ac4150..81e704a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > @@ -1572,47 +1572,84 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page)
> > > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * ra_sum_pages() merge contiguous pages into one bio and submit.
> > > > > > + * these pre-readed pages are linked in pages list.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
> > > > > > +				int start, int nrpages)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	struct page *page;
> > > > > > +	int page_idx = start;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	for (; page_idx < start + nrpages; page_idx++) {
> > > > > > +		/* alloc temporal page for read node summary info*/
> > > > > > +		page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > > > +		if (!page) {
> > > > > > +			struct page *tmp;
> > > > > > +			list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, pages, lru) {
> > > > > > +				list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > > > +				unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > +				__free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > +			}
> > > > > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +		lock_page(page);
> > > > > > +		page->index = page_idx;
> > > > > > +		list_add_tail(&page->lru, pages);
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	list_for_each_entry(page, pages, lru)
> > > > > > +		submit_read_page(sbi, page, page->index, READ_SYNC);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	f2fs_submit_read_bio(sbi, READ_SYNC);
> > > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >  int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > > >  			unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >  	struct f2fs_node *rn;
> > > > > >  	struct f2fs_summary *sum_entry;
> > > > > > -	struct page *page;
> > > > > > +	struct page *page, *tmp;
> > > > > >  	block_t addr;
> > > > > > -	int i, last_offset;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > -	/* alloc temporal page for read node */
> > > > > > -	page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > > > -	if (!page)
> > > > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > -	lock_page(page);
> > > > > > +	int bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
> > > > > > +	int i, last_offset, nrpages, err = 0;
> > > > > > +	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	/* scan the node segment */
> > > > > >  	last_offset = sbi->blocks_per_seg;
> > > > > >  	addr = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno);
> > > > > >  	sum_entry = &sum->entries[0];
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -	for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i++, sum_entry++) {
> > > > > > -		/*
> > > > > > -		 * In order to read next node page,
> > > > > > -		 * we must clear PageUptodate flag.
> > > > > > -		 */
> > > > > > -		ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > > > > > +	for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i += nrpages, addr += nrpages) {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -		if (f2fs_readpage(sbi, page, addr, READ_SYNC))
> > > > > > -			goto out;
> > > > > > +		nrpages = min(last_offset - i, bio_blocks);
> > > > > > +		/* read ahead node pages */
> > > > > > +		err = ra_sum_pages(sbi, &page_list, addr, nrpages);
> > > > > > +		if (err)
> > > > > > +			return err;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -		lock_page(page);
> > > > > > -		rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > > > -		sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > > > -		sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > > > -		sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > > > -		addr++;
> > > > > > +		list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +			lock_page(page);
> > > > > > +			if(PageUptodate(page)) {
> > > > > > +				rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > > > +				sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > > > +				sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > > > +				sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > > > +				sum_entry++;
> > > > > > +			} else {
> > > > > > +				err = -EIO;
> > > > > > +			}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +			list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > > > +			unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > +			__free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > +		}
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > > -	unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > -out:
> > > > > > -	__free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > -	return 0;
> > > > > > +	return err;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  static bool flush_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > > > Samsung
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Samsung
> >
> 
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	'谭姝' <shu.tan@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:56:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003101ceebfe$bab50890$301f19b0$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385609608.2417.38.camel@kjgkr>

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:33 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 2013-11-28 (목), 09:26 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > Hi Kim,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 4:19 PM
> > > To: Chao Yu
> > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; '谭姝'
> > > Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2013-11-27 (수), 15:58 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > Hi Kim,
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:30 PM
> > > > > To: Chao Yu
> > > > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; 谭姝
> > > > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Chao,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that we already have a readahed function for node pages,
> > > > > ra_node_page().
> > > > > So, we don't make a page list for this, but can use the node_inode's
> > > > > page cache.
> > > >
> > > > So you mean it's waste to release page list with updated data after we
> > > > finish work in restore_node_summary, right?
> > >
> > > Right.
> >
> > So how about add all pages of page list to node_inode's address space by
> > add_to_page_cache_lru() with arg sum_entry->nid?
> 
> I don't think it's proper way to use add_to_page_cache_lru() directly.

This is the way used in VM readahead(i.e. read_pages/mpage_readpages/
read_cache_pages).
So what you worry about is that using lonely add_to_page_cache_lru()
may cause exception, is it?

> 
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So how about writing ra_node_pages() which use the node_inode's page
> > > > > cache?
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, so ra_node_pages is introduced for read node_inode's pages which are
> > > > logical contiguously? and it also could take place of ra_node_page?
> > >
> > > Ah. The ra_node_page() read a node page ahead for a given node id.
> > > So it doesn't match exactly between ra_node_page() and ra_node_pages()
> > > that I suggested.
> > > So how about reading node pages and then caching some of them in the
> > > page cache, node_inode's address space?
> >
> > Got it,
> > If we do not use the method above, we should search the NAT for nid number
> > as the index of node_inode's page by the specified node page blkaddr, that costs
> > a lot.
> > How do you think?
> 
> 1. grab_cache_page(node_footer->nid);
> 2. memcpy();
> 3. SetPageUptodate();
> 4. f2fs_put_page();

It could be.

This make ra_node_pages() synchronized, because we should read node_footer->nid
from updated node page before we cache node pages, and we will still use page list to
pass the updated page.

Why not introduce f2fs_cache_node_pages() include your code to cache node pages after
ra_node_pages()?

Thanks,
Yu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013-11-22 (금), 15:48 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > > > If cp has no CP_UMOUNT_FLAG, we will read all pages in whole node segment
> > > > > > one by one, it makes low performance. So let's merge contiguous pages and
> > > > > > readahead for better performance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  fs/f2fs/node.c |   89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > index 4ac4150..81e704a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > > > > @@ -1572,47 +1572,84 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page)
> > > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * ra_sum_pages() merge contiguous pages into one bio and submit.
> > > > > > + * these pre-readed pages are linked in pages list.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
> > > > > > +				int start, int nrpages)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	struct page *page;
> > > > > > +	int page_idx = start;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	for (; page_idx < start + nrpages; page_idx++) {
> > > > > > +		/* alloc temporal page for read node summary info*/
> > > > > > +		page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > > > +		if (!page) {
> > > > > > +			struct page *tmp;
> > > > > > +			list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, pages, lru) {
> > > > > > +				list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > > > +				unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > +				__free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > +			}
> > > > > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +		lock_page(page);
> > > > > > +		page->index = page_idx;
> > > > > > +		list_add_tail(&page->lru, pages);
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	list_for_each_entry(page, pages, lru)
> > > > > > +		submit_read_page(sbi, page, page->index, READ_SYNC);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	f2fs_submit_read_bio(sbi, READ_SYNC);
> > > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > >  int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > > >  			unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >  	struct f2fs_node *rn;
> > > > > >  	struct f2fs_summary *sum_entry;
> > > > > > -	struct page *page;
> > > > > > +	struct page *page, *tmp;
> > > > > >  	block_t addr;
> > > > > > -	int i, last_offset;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > -	/* alloc temporal page for read node */
> > > > > > -	page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ZERO);
> > > > > > -	if (!page)
> > > > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > -	lock_page(page);
> > > > > > +	int bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
> > > > > > +	int i, last_offset, nrpages, err = 0;
> > > > > > +	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	/* scan the node segment */
> > > > > >  	last_offset = sbi->blocks_per_seg;
> > > > > >  	addr = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno);
> > > > > >  	sum_entry = &sum->entries[0];
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -	for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i++, sum_entry++) {
> > > > > > -		/*
> > > > > > -		 * In order to read next node page,
> > > > > > -		 * we must clear PageUptodate flag.
> > > > > > -		 */
> > > > > > -		ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > > > > > +	for (i = 0; i < last_offset; i += nrpages, addr += nrpages) {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -		if (f2fs_readpage(sbi, page, addr, READ_SYNC))
> > > > > > -			goto out;
> > > > > > +		nrpages = min(last_offset - i, bio_blocks);
> > > > > > +		/* read ahead node pages */
> > > > > > +		err = ra_sum_pages(sbi, &page_list, addr, nrpages);
> > > > > > +		if (err)
> > > > > > +			return err;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -		lock_page(page);
> > > > > > -		rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > > > -		sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > > > -		sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > > > -		sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > > > -		addr++;
> > > > > > +		list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +			lock_page(page);
> > > > > > +			if(PageUptodate(page)) {
> > > > > > +				rn = F2FS_NODE(page);
> > > > > > +				sum_entry->nid = rn->footer.nid;
> > > > > > +				sum_entry->version = 0;
> > > > > > +				sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
> > > > > > +				sum_entry++;
> > > > > > +			} else {
> > > > > > +				err = -EIO;
> > > > > > +			}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +			list_del(&page->lru);
> > > > > > +			unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > +			__free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > +		}
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > > -	unlock_page(page);
> > > > > > -out:
> > > > > > -	__free_pages(page, 0);
> > > > > > -	return 0;
> > > > > > +	return err;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  static bool flush_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > > > Samsung
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Samsung
> >
> 
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-28  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-22  7:48 [PATCH] f2fs: readahead contiguous pages for restore_node_summary Chao Yu
2013-11-22  7:48 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2013-11-27  5:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-27  5:29   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-27  7:58   ` Chao Yu
2013-11-27  7:58     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2013-11-27  8:19     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-27  8:19       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-28  1:26       ` Chao Yu
2013-11-28  1:26         ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2013-11-28  3:33         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-11-28  5:56           ` Chao Yu [this message]
2013-11-28  5:56             ` Chao Yu
2013-11-30  5:12             ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='003101ceebfe$bab50890$301f19b0$@samsung.com' \
    --to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.