All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
To: 'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>, 'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@arndb.de>,
	'Kevin Hilman' <khilman@linaro.org>,
	'Mike Turquette' <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	'Krzysztof Kozlowski' <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	'Michael Turquette' <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 2nd 2/4] Samsung DT 3rd updates for v4.3
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:11:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <005101d0d5b0$5d4333b0$17c99b10$@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150813092038.GC30160@localhost>

Olof Johansson wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:12:34AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Olof, Kevin
> >
> > This is based on tags/samsung-dt-2 and including exynos4 related clock
> > changes to support cpufreq-dt driver for exynos4 SoCs. Note that I've
> > created one more clk topic branch called v4.3-topic/clk-samsung-2 based
> > on previous one has been merged by Mike into clock tree before but I'm
> > not sure new one merged into clk tree that's why I've noted its merge in
> > this signed tag.
> 
> Since this depends on the previous DT branch that I asked for a respin, please
> do it all over and send a fresh pull request that we hopefully can include.
> 
Yes, will make a fresh pull request for the exynos cpufreq-dt driver.

> We normally ask that you don't queue up merge requests like these for that
> reason: If there's need to redo an earlier branch there's a lot of work that
> needs to be done on your side. Instead, please wait until previous pull request
> has been merged before you send the next one. Thanks!
> 
Yeah, you're right. Actually, it was hard to handle it because of dependencies
of clk and cpufreq...Anyway I'll keep in mind what you suggested.

Thanks,
Kukjin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL 2nd 2/4] Samsung DT 3rd updates for v4.3
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:11:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <005101d0d5b0$5d4333b0$17c99b10$@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150813092038.GC30160@localhost>

Olof Johansson wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:12:34AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Olof, Kevin
> >
> > This is based on tags/samsung-dt-2 and including exynos4 related clock
> > changes to support cpufreq-dt driver for exynos4 SoCs. Note that I've
> > created one more clk topic branch called v4.3-topic/clk-samsung-2 based
> > on previous one has been merged by Mike into clock tree before but I'm
> > not sure new one merged into clk tree that's why I've noted its merge in
> > this signed tag.
> 
> Since this depends on the previous DT branch that I asked for a respin, please
> do it all over and send a fresh pull request that we hopefully can include.
> 
Yes, will make a fresh pull request for the exynos cpufreq-dt driver.

> We normally ask that you don't queue up merge requests like these for that
> reason: If there's need to redo an earlier branch there's a lot of work that
> needs to be done on your side. Instead, please wait until previous pull request
> has been merged before you send the next one. Thanks!
> 
Yeah, you're right. Actually, it was hard to handle it because of dependencies
of clk and cpufreq...Anyway I'll keep in mind what you suggested.

Thanks,
Kukjin

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-13 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-13  0:12 [GIT PULL 2nd 2/4] Samsung DT 3rd updates for v4.3 Kukjin Kim
2015-08-13  0:12 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-08-13  9:20 ` Olof Johansson
2015-08-13  9:20   ` Olof Johansson
2015-08-13 10:11   ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2015-08-13 10:11     ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='005101d0d5b0$5d4333b0$17c99b10$@kernel.org' \
    --to=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.