All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John Hawkes" <hawkes@sgi.com>
To: dino@in.ibm.com, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains build fix
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:09:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006a01c5a8c6$3c2006d0$6600a8c0@PCJohn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20050824112640.GB5197@in.ibm.com

From: "Dinakar Guniguntala" <dino@in.ibm.com>
> Can we hold on to this patch for a while, as I reported yesterday,
> this hangs up my ppc64 box on doing rmdir on a exclusive cpuset.
> Still debugging the problem, hope to have a fix soon, Thanks

Paul's patch simply constrains the scope of cpuset configurations that will 
invoke the "dynamic sched domains" functionality, which means that some 
cpu-exclusive (a.k.a. "isolated") cpusets will continue to have the 
2.6.12-and-earlier behavior of being periodically examined by the CPU 
Scheduler in load-balancing activities.  That is, Paul's patch simply reverts 
cpuset/sched domain behavior to pre-2.6.13 status (for some cpusets).

The pre-2.6.13 non-"dynamic sched domains" behavior will in fact produce bad 
load-balancing behavior if a cpu-exclusive cpuset is so heavily loaded with 
executing processes, all pinned to the cpu(s) in the cpuset, that the other 
cpus in the system see this cpu(s)/node as the most-heavily-loaded and just 
focus on it during load-balancing -- which would be futile, of course, since 
the processes pinned to this highest-load cpu (and node) cannot be offloaded. 
Since load-balancing looks only at the most-heavily-loaded cpu as a cpu to 
offload, this means that all system load-balancing would be effectively turned 
off.

John Hawkes 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "John Hawkes" <hawkes@sgi.com>
To: <dino@in.ibm.com>, "Paul Jackson" <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: <paulus@samba.org>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	<nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	<mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains build fix
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:09:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006a01c5a8c6$3c2006d0$6600a8c0@PCJohn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20050824112640.GB5197@in.ibm.com

From: "Dinakar Guniguntala" <dino@in.ibm.com>
> Can we hold on to this patch for a while, as I reported yesterday,
> this hangs up my ppc64 box on doing rmdir on a exclusive cpuset.
> Still debugging the problem, hope to have a fix soon, Thanks

Paul's patch simply constrains the scope of cpuset configurations that will 
invoke the "dynamic sched domains" functionality, which means that some 
cpu-exclusive (a.k.a. "isolated") cpusets will continue to have the 
2.6.12-and-earlier behavior of being periodically examined by the CPU 
Scheduler in load-balancing activities.  That is, Paul's patch simply reverts 
cpuset/sched domain behavior to pre-2.6.13 status (for some cpusets).

The pre-2.6.13 non-"dynamic sched domains" behavior will in fact produce bad 
load-balancing behavior if a cpu-exclusive cpuset is so heavily loaded with 
executing processes, all pinned to the cpu(s) in the cpuset, that the other 
cpus in the system see this cpu(s)/node as the most-heavily-loaded and just 
focus on it during load-balancing -- which would be futile, of course, since 
the processes pinned to this highest-load cpu (and node) cannot be offloaded. 
Since load-balancing looks only at the most-heavily-loaded cpu as a cpu to 
offload, this means that all system load-balancing would be effectively turned 
off.

John Hawkes 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-24 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-23  8:04 [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix Paul Jackson
2005-08-23  8:04 ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-23  8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-23  8:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-23 15:07 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-08-23 15:19   ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-08-24  0:19 ` John Hawkes
2005-08-24  0:19   ` John Hawkes
2005-08-24 11:15 ` [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains build fix Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 11:15   ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 11:26   ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-08-24 11:38     ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-08-24 11:46     ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 11:46       ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 12:01       ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-24 12:01         ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-24 20:31         ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 20:31           ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-25  0:02           ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-25  0:02             ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-25  0:57             ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-25  0:57               ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-25 14:41           ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-08-25 14:53             ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-08-25 15:20             ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-25 15:20               ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 16:09     ` John Hawkes [this message]
2005-08-24 16:09       ` John Hawkes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='006a01c5a8c6$3c2006d0$6600a8c0@PCJohn' \
    --to=hawkes@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.