Uboot and ML410

Uboot and ML410

[khollan]

Hi 

Is there a patch to include support for the ml410 in the Main git tree of
u-boot?  I tried compiling Xilinx's tree but it seems it won't compile
correctly with my version of make (3.81).  Also is there any support for the
Hard TEMAC in u-boot?  I tried looking for both of these questions but a lot
of the threads were unanswered questions.  Thanks for your help

kholland
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Uboot-and-ML410-tf4951335.html#a14177109
Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Uboot and ML410

[Grant Likely]

On 12/5/07, khollan <khollan@daktronics.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is there a patch to include support for the ml410 in the Main git tree of
> u-boot?  I tried compiling Xilinx's tree but it seems it won't compile
> correctly with my version of make (3.81).

I don't think there is.

>  Also is there any support for the
> Hard TEMAC in u-boot?  I tried looking for both of these questions but a lot
> of the threads were unanswered questions.  Thanks for your help

No, unfortunately nobody has got a hard TEMAC driver into u-boot mainline.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195

RE: Uboot and ML410

[John Hahn]

We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the u-boot.zip
srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for our ml403 based
development, we can build u-boot for ml403_config as well as ml410_config.


Cheers

John
_________________
John S Hahn
BCF Semiconductor



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+jhahn=bcfsemi.com@ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+jhahn=bcfsemi.com@ozlabs.org] On
> Behalf Of khollan
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:00 AM
> To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Uboot and ML410
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> Is there a patch to include support for the ml410 in the Main git tree
> of u-boot?  I tried compiling Xilinx's tree but it seems it won't
> compile correctly with my version of make (3.81).  Also is there any
> support for the Hard TEMAC in u-boot?  I tried looking for both of
> these questions but a lot of the threads were unanswered questions.
> Thanks for your help
> 
> kholland
> --

RE: Uboot and ML410

[khollan]

John Hahn wrote:
> 
> We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
> downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the u-boot.zip
> srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for our ml403 based
> development, we can build u-boot for ml403_config as well as ml410_config.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> John
> 

When I try compiling with my tools I get the message 
 No rule to make target `hello_world.srec', needed by `all'
Any way to work around this.  I have compiled everything else I use on my
system with these tools and it works fine.  I did some research on this
problem and it seemed to be a problem with the newer versions of make, but
if thats not the case what is the problem?  I don't really want to install
ELDK to keep things consistent.
Thanks
Kevin
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Uboot-and-ML410-tf4951335.html#a14198812
Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Uboot and ML410

[John Hahn]

This thread really belongs in the u-boot mailing list, I will respond there:

U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Cheers

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+jhahn=bcfsemi.com@ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+jhahn=bcfsemi.com@ozlabs.org] On
> Behalf Of khollan
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:01 AM
> To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: Uboot and ML410
> 
> 
> 
> 
> John Hahn wrote:
> >
> > We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
> > downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the
> > u-boot.zip srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for
> > our ml403 based development, we can build u-boot for ml403_config as
> well as ml410_config.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > John
> >
> 
> When I try compiling with my tools I get the message  No rule to make
> target `hello_world.srec', needed by `all'
> Any way to work around this.  I have compiled everything else I use on
> my system with these tools and it works fine.  I did some research on
> this problem and it seemed to be a problem with the newer versions of
> make, but if thats not the case what is the problem?  I don't really
> want to install ELDK to keep things consistent.
> Thanks
> Kevin
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Uboot-and-ML410-
> tf4951335.html#a14198812
> Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

Re: Uboot and ML410

[Ben Warren]

khollan wrote:
>
> John Hahn wrote:
>   
>> We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
>> downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the u-boot.zip
>> srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for our ml403 based
>> development, we can build u-boot for ml403_config as well as ml410_config.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> John
>>
>>     
>
> When I try compiling with my tools I get the message 
>  No rule to make target `hello_world.srec', needed by `all'
> Any way to work around this.  I have compiled everything else I use on my
> system with these tools and it works fine.  I did some research on this
> problem and it seemed to be a problem with the newer versions of make, but
> if thats not the case what is the problem?  I don't really want to install
> ELDK to keep things consistent.
> Thanks
> Kevin
>   
This is an old problem that has been fixed in the U-boot make files for 
probably a year or so. If you can't upgrade U-boot, just comment out the 
'examples' line in U-boot's main Makefile like this:

SUBDIRS = tools \
# examples

regards,
Ben

[U-Boot-Users] Uboot and ML410

[John Hahn]

Bringing a discussion thread over from 
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+jhahn=bcfsemi.com at ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+jhahn=bcfsemi.com at ozlabs.org] On
> Behalf Of khollan
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:01 AM
...
> 
> John Hahn wrote:
> >
> > We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
> > downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the
> > u-boot.zip srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for
> > our ml403 based development, we can build u-boot for ml403_config as
> well as ml410_config.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > John
> >
> 
> When I try compiling with my tools I get the message  No rule to make
> target `hello_world.srec', needed by `all'
> Any way to work around this.  I have compiled everything else I use on
> my system with these tools and it works fine.  I did some research on
> this problem and it seemed to be a problem with the newer versions of
> make, but if thats not the case what is the problem?  I don't really
> want to install ELDK to keep things consistent.
> Thanks
> Kevin
> --

The targets in examples are example programs for uboot to load/exec and is
not part of u-boot. You can avoid building in examples.
But the build problem appears to be due to examples/Makefile syntax. Try:

-BIN    = hello_world hello_world.bin
+BIN    = hello_world.bin hello_world

... similar corrections for the other targets, and finally

-all:   .depend $(OBJS) $(LIB) $(BIN) $(SREC)
+all:   .depend $(OBJS) $(LIB) $(SREC) $(BIN)

Cheers

John
_________________
John S Hahn
BCF Semiconductor

[U-Boot-Users] Uboot and ML410

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear John,

in message <000d01c83845$d98fd4c0$8caf7e40$@com> you wrote:
> > >
> > > We are also using 3.81 make (Centos 5 distro) with ELDK 4.1 version
> > > downloaded from www.denx.de and have had no problems using the
> > > u-boot.zip srcs from www.xilinx.com/ml410_p, though we use uboot for

Well, I have to admit that I don't know Xilinx's U-Boot code, This
list is intended for suppoort of the publicly available ("official")
source tree only.

> The targets in examples are example programs for uboot to load/exec and is
> not part of u-boot. You can avoid building in examples.

Of cours ethe examples are a part of the U-Boot distribution.

> But the build problem appears to be due to examples/Makefile syntax. Try:
> 
> -BIN    = hello_world hello_world.bin
> +BIN    = hello_world.bin hello_world
> 
> ... similar corrections for the other targets, and finally
> 
> -all:   .depend $(OBJS) $(LIB) $(BIN) $(SREC)
> +all:   .depend $(OBJS) $(LIB) $(SREC) $(BIN)

This is not a correction. It is not even a work around. No part in  a
Makefile  should  in any way depend on the order in which targets are
listed.

My feeling is that you are hunting a dead rat, i. e. a bug that has
been fixed in the public U-Boot tree a long, long time ago.

Please try using a current version of U-Bot (1.3.1).

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"Never give in.  Never give in.  Never. Never. Never."
- Winston Churchill

Re: Uboot and ML410

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <14198812.post@talk.nabble.com> you wrote:
> 
> When I try compiling with my tools I get the message 
>  No rule to make target `hello_world.srec', needed by `all'
> Any way to work around this.  I have compiled everything else I use on my

Yes - just use a current version of the code (i. e. U-Boot 1.3.1).


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Misquotation is, in fact, the pride and privilege of the  learned.  A
widely-read  man  never  quotes  accurately,  for  the rather obvious
reason that he has read too widely.
                - Hesketh Pearson _Common Misquotations_ introduction