[parisc-linux] ftp://parisc-linus.org/cvs - binutils? - glibc?

[parisc-linux] ftp://parisc-linus.org/cvs - binutils? - glibc?

[Michael S.Zick]

Hello group,

Could someone please tell me where to go?*

I have checked both /cvs and /src but can not find "glibc" and "binutils" 
snapshots.
Where could I find these?

There have been a number of recent patchs to binutils for hppa.  (Such as: 
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-11/msg00622.html ) by Alan Modra.
I would like to try keeping a local tree of the hppa version.

Mike
*A rather dangerous question for me to ask.

Re: [parisc-linux] ftp://parisc-linus.org/cvs - binutils? - glibc?

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:08:05PM -0600, Michael S . Zick wrote:
> I have checked both /cvs and /src but can not find "glibc" and "binutils" 
> snapshots.
> Where could I find these?

you can't.  we have not maintained glibc & binutils cvs trees for a while.
i suggest the debian packages as your best source of latest bits.

> There have been a number of recent patchs to binutils for hppa.  (Such as: 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-11/msg00622.html ) by Alan Modra.
> I would like to try keeping a local tree of the hppa version.

nobody's going to stop you doing that, though why you wouldn't simply
use the upstream cvs binutils, i don't know.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

Re: [parisc-linux] ftp://parisc-linux.org/cvs - binutils? - glibc?

[Michael S.Zick]

On Tuesday 27 November 2001 12:21 pm, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>  we have not maintained glibc & binutils cvs trees for a while.
> i suggest the debian packages as your best source of latest bits.

Thanks.

> why you wouldn't simply
> use the upstream cvs binutils, i don't know.

A misunderstanding on my part.
I thought that since gcc was a special, branch version, glibc and binutils 
were also (still) specials.

Thanks again.

Mike