All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, usama.anjum@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	maz@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/21] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:19:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01f4cf62-eb8f-4435-bc92-6e8a2d196a20@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908151741.394589-15-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On 9/8/26 16:17, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently arm64's this_cpu_*() ops transiently disable preemption in
> order to guarantee that the address generation and memory access(es)
> occur on the same CPU.
> 
> Transiently disabling preemption can be  expensive. When re-enabling
> preemption it is necessary to make a conditional function call to
> preempt_schedule[_notrace]() in order to handle the rare case that the
> task needs to be rescheduled. The potential function call has a number
> of negative effects on code generation (e.g. due to the need to create a
> stack frame and spill registers), and the conditionality can result in
> poor code generation and/or poor branch prediction.
> 
> This patch adds infrastructure for a scheme where this_cpu_*() ops do
> not need to transiently disable preemption, avoiding the negative
> impacts described above. Individual operations will be converted in
> subsequent patches.
> 
> Each operation registers a critical section during which the exception
> return code will adjust the offset and addresses if preemption occurs
> mid-sequence. The critical section is registered/unregistered with a
> small prologue and epilogue which encodes three distinct GPRRs (<pcp>,
> <off>, <addr>) into a new thread_info::pcp_gprs field:
> 
>          // Prologue. Enable fixups for <off> and <addr>.
>          mrs	<tsk>, sp_el0
>          mov	<tmp>, #__VAL_PCPU_GPRS(<pcp>, <off>, <addr>)
>          strh	<tmp>, [<tsk>, #TSK_TI_PCPU_GPRS]
> 
>          // Generate cpu-specific address
>          mrs	<off>, TPIDR_ELx
>          add	<addr>, <pcp>, <off>
> 
>          // Perform access sequence
>          ldr	<val>, [<addr>]
> 
>          // Epilogue. Disable fixups
>          strh	wzr, [<tsk>, #TSK_TI_PCPU_GPRS]
> 
> If an exception is taken from within the critical section, the exception
> return code will adjust <off> to be the current CPU's offset, and will
> adjust <addr> to be (<pcp> + <off>). Distinct registers are used for
> <pcp>, <off>, and <addr>, so that the fixup can be applied safely at any
> point during the critical section.
> 
> To ensure that this_cpu_*() operations within exception handlers work
> correctly and do not corrupt state, thread_info::pcpu_gprs is saved
> into a new pt_regs::pcpu_gprs field upon exception entry, and restored
> upon exception return.
> 
> Looking at a simple this_cpu_operation:
> 
> | void outline_this_cpu_add_u64(u64 __percpu *p, u64 v)
> | {
> | 	this_cpu_add(*p, v);
> | }
> 
> Atop v7.2-rc4, with GCC 15.2.0 and defconfig, this is compiled as:
> 
> | <outline_this_cpu_add_u64>:
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mrs     x2, sp_el0
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        ldr     w3, [x2, #8]
> |        add     w3, w3, #0x1
> |        str     w3, [x2, #8]
> |        mrs     x3, tpidr_el1
> |        add     x0, x0, x3
> | 1:     ldxr    x5, [x0]
> |        add     x5, x5, x1
> |        stxr    w4, x5, [x0]
> |        cbnz    w4, 1b
> |        ldr     x0, [x2, #8]
> |        sub     x0, x0, #0x1
> |        str     w0, [x2, #8]
> |        cbz     x0, 2f
> |        ldr     x0, [x2, #8]
> |        cbnz    x0, 3f
> | 2:     bl      preempt_schedule_notrace
> | 3:     ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> 
> With the scheme added in this patch, this can be compiled as:
> 
> | <outline_this_cpu_add_u64>:
> |        mrs     x2, sp_el0
> |        mov     x4, #0xc80     // __VAL_PCPU_GPRS(x0, x4, x3)
> |        strh    w4, [x2, #20]
> |        mrs     x4, tpidr_el1
> |        add     x3, x0, x4
> | 1:     ldxr    x6, [x3]
> |        add     x6, x6, x1
> |        stxr    w5, x6, [x3]
> |        cbnz    w5, 1b
> |        strh    wzr, [x2, #20]
> |        ret
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
> Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h      | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h      |  5 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c      |  2 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c     | 38 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S            | 22 +++++++++
>  6 files changed, 139 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> index 746d2a56f48bb..03fa916030fd1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -5,10 +5,13 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_PERCPU_H
>  #define __ASM_PERCPU_H
>  
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <linux/preempt.h>
> +#include <linux/stringify.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> +#include <asm/gpr-num.h>
>  #include <asm/stack_pointer.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>  
> @@ -51,6 +54,74 @@ static inline unsigned long __kern_my_cpu_offset(void)
>  	return off;
>  }
>  
> +#define PCPU_GPR_PCP_SHIFT		0
> +#define PCPU_GPR_PCP			GENMASK(4, 0)
> +#define PCPU_GPR_OFF_SHIFT		5
> +#define PCPU_GPR_OFF			GENMASK(9, 5)
> +#define PCPU_GPR_ADDR_SHIFT		10
> +#define PCPU_GPR_ADDR			GENMASK(14, 10)
> +
> +#define __VAL_PCPU_GPRS(pcp, off, addr)							\
> +	"("										\
> +		"(" __GPR_NUM(pcp)  " << " __stringify(PCPU_GPR_PCP_SHIFT) ") | "	\
> +		"(" __GPR_NUM(off)  " << " __stringify(PCPU_GPR_OFF_SHIFT) ") | "	\
> +		"(" __GPR_NUM(addr) " << " __stringify(PCPU_GPR_ADDR_SHIFT) ")"		\
> +	")"
> +
> +#define __ASSERT_PCPU_GPRS_DISTINCT(pcp, off, addr)			\
> +	".if ("								\
> +		"(" __GPR_NUM(pcp) " == " __GPR_NUM(off) ") || "	\
> +		"(" __GPR_NUM(pcp) " == " __GPR_NUM(addr) ") || "	\
> +		"(" __GPR_NUM(off) " == " __GPR_NUM(addr) ")"		\
> +	"    )\n"							\
> +	".error \"PCPU GPRS overlap: {" pcp "," off "," addr "}\"\n"	\
> +	".endif\n"
> +
> +#define ____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN(gprs, pcp, off, addr)			\
> +	"// ____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN(" gprs ", " pcp ", " off ", " addr")\n"	\
> +	__DEFINE_ASM_GPR_NUMS						\
> +	__DEFINE_ASM_GPR_ALIASES					\
> +	__ASSERT_PCPU_GPRS_DISTINCT(pcp, off, addr)			\
> +	"	mov w" off ", #" __VAL_PCPU_GPRS(pcp, off, addr) "\n"	\
> +	"	strh	w" off ", " gprs "\n"				\
> +	__KERN_ASM_CPU_OFFSET(off) "\n"
> +
> +/*
> + * Begin a PCPU GPR critical section which requires <addr> (and <off>).
> + *
> + * At the start of the critical section, and upon any (preemptible) exception
> + * until __PCPU_GPRS_END():
> + * - <off>  will be set to the current CPU's percpu offset.
> + * - <addr> will be set to <pcp> + <off>.
> + *
> + * The <pcp>, <off>, and <addr> registers must be distinct GPRs.
> + *
> + * <gprs> must be '&current_thread_info()->gprs', as a memory operand which can
> + * be written both at the start and end of the critical section (e.g. using
> + * "=Qo" constraints).
> + */
> +#define __PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN(gprs, pcp, off, addr)				\
> +	____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN(gprs, pcp, off, addr)			\
> +	"	add	" addr ", " pcp ", " off "\n"
> +
> +/*
> + * Begin a PCPU GPR critical section which only requires <off> and does not
> + * require <addr>.
> + *
> + * This is only for operations that can use register-offset addressing,
> + * e.g. STR <Xt>, [<Xn>, <Xm].
> + *
> + * All other details are the same as __PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN().
> + */
> +#define __PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN_OFFSET(gprs, pcp, off)			\
> +	____PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN(gprs, pcp, off, "xzr")
> +
> +/*
> + * End a PCU GPR critical section.
> + */
> +#define __PCPU_GPRS_END(gprs)						\
> +	"	strh	wzr, " gprs "\n"
> +
>  #ifdef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
>  #define __my_cpu_offset __hyp_my_cpu_offset()
>  #else
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index f635c3453a858..25c70374cb7b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,11 @@ struct pt_regs {
>  
>  	u64 sdei_ttbr1;
>  	struct frame_record_meta stackframe;
> +
> +	u16	pcpu_gprs;
> +	u16	__unused1;
> +	u32	__unused2;
> +	u64	__unused3;
>  };
>  
>  /* For correct stack alignment, pt_regs has to be a multiple of 16 bytes. */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 5d7fe3e153c85..6db5fa72211d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct thread_info {
>  	u64			mpam_partid_pmg;
>  #endif
>  	u32			cpu;
> +	u16			pcpu_gprs;
>  };
>  
>  #define thread_saved_pc(tsk)	\
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 9c853ed3ceab8..9d603317eeb99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ int main(void)
>    DEFINE(TSK_TI_SCS_BASE,	offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.scs_base));
>    DEFINE(TSK_TI_SCS_SP,		offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.scs_sp));
>  #endif
> +  DEFINE(TSK_TI_PCPU_GPRS,	offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info.pcpu_gprs));
>    DEFINE(TSK_STACK,		offsetof(struct task_struct, stack));
>  #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
>    DEFINE(TSK_STACK_CANARY,	offsetof(struct task_struct, stack_canary));
> @@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ int main(void)
>    DEFINE(S_PMR,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, pmr));
>    DEFINE(S_STACKFRAME,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, stackframe));
>    DEFINE(S_STACKFRAME_TYPE,	offsetof(struct pt_regs, stackframe.type));
> +  DEFINE(S_PCPU_GPRS,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, pcpu_gprs));
>    DEFINE(PT_REGS_SIZE,		sizeof(struct pt_regs));
>    BLANK();
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index 72c03ccea59fe..11d3f888fcd87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -25,12 +25,49 @@
>  #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
>  #include <asm/kprobes.h>
>  #include <asm/mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/percpu.h>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <asm/sdei.h>
>  #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>  #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  
> +/*
> + * Where the context being returned to had an active percpu GPR critical
> + * section, ensure that the offset and address GPRs are updated to match the
> + * current CPU.
> + *
> + * For simplicity we always update the GPRs when a critical section is active
> + * and preemption was *possible*, regardless of whether preemption actually
> + * occurred. Where preemption did not occur, the updates are redundant but not
> + * harmful.
> + */
> +static __always_inline void irqentry_exit_pcpu_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	int reg_pcp, reg_off, reg_addr;
> +	unsigned long pcp, off, addr;
> +	u16 gprs = regs->pcpu_gprs;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Zero means no active PCPU GPRs. As the PCPU GPRs must be distinct,
> +	 * a PCPU critical section cannot possibly use {x0,x0,x0}.
> +	 */
> +	if (likely(!gprs))
> +		return;
> +
> +	reg_pcp  = FIELD_GET(PCPU_GPR_PCP,  gprs);
> +	reg_off  = FIELD_GET(PCPU_GPR_OFF,  gprs);
> +	reg_addr = FIELD_GET(PCPU_GPR_ADDR, gprs);
> +
> +	pcp = pt_regs_read_reg(regs, reg_pcp);
> +
> +	off = __kern_my_cpu_offset();
> +	pt_regs_write_reg(regs, reg_off, off);
> +
> +	addr = pcp + off;
> +	pt_regs_write_reg(regs, reg_addr, addr);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Handle IRQ/context state management when entering from kernel mode.
>   * Before this function is called it is not safe to call regular kernel code,
> @@ -56,6 +93,7 @@ static void noinstr __arm64_exit_to_kernel_mode(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  						irqentry_state_t state)
>  {
>  	local_daif_mask();
> +	irqentry_exit_pcpu_adjust(regs);
>  	mte_check_tfsr_exit();
>  	irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode_after_preempt(regs, state);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 0902c1bd9dd3d..8d17f61d1b5b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -194,6 +194,17 @@ alternative_cb_end
>  #endif
>  	.endm
>  
> +	.macro pcpu_gprs_entry, tsk:req, regs:req, tmp:req
> +	ldrh	w\tmp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_PCPU_GPRS]
> +	strh	w\tmp, [\regs, #S_PCPU_GPRS]
> +	strh	wzr, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_PCPU_GPRS]
> +	.endm
> +
> +	.macro pcpu_gprs_exit, tsk:req, regs:req, tmp:req
> +	ldrh	w\tmp, [\regs, #S_PCPU_GPRS]
> +	strh	w\tmp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_PCPU_GPRS]
> +	.endm
> +

For my own refernce. The reason we disable critical section on entry
and re-enable on exit is to deal with nested exceptions, for insatnce,

< exception #1 >
     regs->pcpu_gpr = tsk->pcpu_gpr // assume non-zero
(1)  tsk->pcpu_gpr = 0
     ...
     < exception #2 >
       regs->pcpu_gpr = tsk->pcpu_gpr // effecevly 0
       tsk->pcpu_gpr = 0
       ...
       irqentry_exit_pcpu_adjust()
(2)      retrun;
       ...
       tsk->pcpu_gpr = regs->pcpu_gpr // effectivly 0
(3)  ...
     irqentry_exit_pcpu_adjust()
       ...
       pt_regs_write_reg(...)
       ...
     tsk->pcpu_gpr = regs->pcpu_gpr // effectivly 0
     ...

witout (1), (2) could update regs, so once returned to (3)
registers for exception #1 could be corrupted.


>  	.macro	kernel_entry, el, regsize = 64
>  	.if	\el == 0
>  	alternative_insn nop, SET_PSTATE_DIT(1), ARM64_HAS_DIT
> @@ -277,6 +288,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
>  	.else
>  	add	x21, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE
>  	get_current_task tsk
> +	pcpu_gprs_entry	tsk, sp, x0
>  	.endif /* \el == 0 */
>  	mrs	x22, elr_el1
>  	mrs	x23, spsr_el1
> @@ -333,6 +345,10 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
>  	.endm
>  
>  	.macro	kernel_exit, el
> +	.if	\el != 0
> +	pcpu_gprs_exit	tsk, sp, x0
> +	.endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
>  alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING
>  	b	.Lskip_pmr_restore\@
> @@ -1040,10 +1056,16 @@ SYM_CODE_START(__sdei_asm_handler)
>  	stp	x29, x4, [sp, #-16]!
>  	mov	x29, sp
>  
> +	add	x16, x19, #SDEI_EVENT_INTREGS
> +	pcpu_gprs_entry tsk, x16, x17
> +
>  	add	x0, x19, #SDEI_EVENT_INTREGS
>  	mov	x1, x19
>  	bl	__sdei_handler
>  
> +	add	x16, x19, #SDEI_EVENT_INTREGS
> +	pcpu_gprs_exit tsk, x16, x17
> +
>  	msr	sp_el0, x20
>  	/* restore regs >x17 that firmware won't restore */
>  	mov	x4, x19         // keep x4 for __sdei_asm_exit_trampoline
> -- 2.30.2
> 

FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-15 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 15:17 [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:56   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] arm64: percpu: Fix LSE operations on {8,16}-bit types Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 15:18   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:21   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:06   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-11 11:43     ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 10:20   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:39   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:43   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 14:24   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:47   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 13:06   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:19   ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 11:58   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:01   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:03   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:07   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:20   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:20   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:21   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-11 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Will Deacon
2026-09-24 16:03 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
2026-09-30 13:14   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01f4cf62-eb8f-4435-bc92-6e8a2d196a20@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.