All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, usama.anjum@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	maz@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/21] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:21:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b78df0e5-9375-47d6-a203-95b931c988d7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908151741.394589-22-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On 9/8/26 16:17, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Now that all this_cpu_*() operations are preemptible, there are no users
> of _pcp_protect() or _pcp_protect_return().
> 
> Remove them both, along with the associated comment regarding
> preemption.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
> Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 27 ---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> index 5cd98e20e825d..6ec6e212932d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -368,33 +368,6 @@ PERCPU_CMPXCHG_OP(x,  , 64)
>  #undef PERCPU_XCHG_OP
>  #undef PERCPU_CMPXCHG_OP
>  
> -/*
> - * It would be nice to avoid the conditional call into the scheduler when
> - * re-enabling preemption for preemptible kernels, but doing that in a way
> - * which builds inside a module would mean messing directly with the preempt
> - * count. If you do this, peterz and tglx will hunt you down.
> - *
> - * Not to mention it'll break the actual preemption model for missing a
> - * preemption point when TIF_NEED_RESCHED gets set while preemption is
> - * disabled.
> - */
> -
> -#define _pcp_protect(op, pcp, ...)					\
> -({									\
> -	preempt_disable_notrace();					\
> -	op(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), __VA_ARGS__);				\
> -	preempt_enable_notrace();					\
> -})
> -
> -#define _pcp_protect_return(op, pcp, args...)				\
> -({									\
> -	typeof(pcp) __retval;						\
> -	preempt_disable_notrace();					\
> -	__retval = (typeof(pcp))op(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), ##args);	\
> -	preempt_enable_notrace();					\
> -	__retval;							\
> -})
> -
>  #define _pcp_wrap(op, pcp, ...)						\
>  ({									\
>  	op(&(pcp), __VA_ARGS__);					\
> -- 2.30.2
> 

FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-15 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 15:17 [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:56   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] arm64: percpu: Fix LSE operations on {8,16}-bit types Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 15:18   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:21   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 10:06   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-11 11:43     ` Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 10:20   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:39   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:43   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 14:24   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-09-11 12:47   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-09-10 13:06   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:19   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 11:58   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:01   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:03   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 12:07   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:20   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:20   ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-08 15:17 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
2026-09-15 14:21   ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2026-09-11 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Will Deacon
2026-09-24 16:03 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
2026-09-30 13:14   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b78df0e5-9375-47d6-a203-95b931c988d7@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.