All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Cornelia Huck" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:47:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02eaa91d-55d7-ce02-3db8-a7db5d1ff679@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9f8f874-9c90-12cd-bf21-1270890041b4@de.ibm.com>

>> I am curious if other update suggestions will be picked up
>> in a constructive way.
> 
> There is only one person on this list that is not constructive,

You could accept a few patches from my selection of change possibilities already.


> and that person is you.

I assume that some dialogue steps would be needed to find a “common wave length” again
so that the communication might become useful also in your view.

Regards,
Markus

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Cornelia Huck" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:47:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02eaa91d-55d7-ce02-3db8-a7db5d1ff679@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9f8f874-9c90-12cd-bf21-1270890041b4@de.ibm.com>

>> I am curious if other update suggestions will be picked up
>> in a constructive way.
> 
> There is only one person on this list that is not constructive,

You could accept a few patches from my selection of change possibilities already.


> and that person is you.

I assume that some dialogue steps would be needed to find a “common wave length” again
so that the communication might become useful also in your view.

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-21 16:03 [PATCH] KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-21 16:03 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-23  8:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-23  8:22   ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-23  9:19   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-23  9:19     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-23 11:08   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-23 11:08     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-23 11:58     ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-23 11:58       ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-24 12:10       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-24 12:10         ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-24 12:18         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-24 12:18           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-24 12:31           ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-24 12:31             ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-24 12:38             ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-24 12:38               ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-24 12:47               ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2017-01-24 12:47                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-23 12:21     ` Dan Carpenter
2017-01-23 12:21       ` Dan Carpenter
2017-01-23 13:21       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-23 13:21         ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-01-23 13:37         ` Dan Carpenter
2017-01-23 13:37           ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=02eaa91d-55d7-ce02-3db8-a7db5d1ff679@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.