From: "voncken" <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr>
To: 'Bartosz Markowski' <bartosz.markowski@tieto.com>
Cc: 'linux-wireless' <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
'Michal Kazior' <michal.kazior@tieto.com>,
'ath10k' <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: ath10k firmware crash
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:05:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02f001cfe878$a64038e0$f2c0aaa0$@acksys.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKGw+H1QSvAL0Ri3HT6E_rhw=DhzDwj1XEeqwjwFkzJVQpz9Q@mail.gmail.com>
> > I did some tests with a linksys WRT1900AC and I have ~950 mbps OTA easily.
>
> You mean ath10k (STA) VS WRT1900AC get up ~950mbps?
> If so, could you say what's the HW, FW version you use?
>
My test platform is one WRT1900AC set in bridge mode with a computer.
If I use the WRT1900AC in AP mode with another computer, I have 950 mbps
If I use the cavium octon III dev plateform + ath10k driver in AP mode, I have around 700 mbps
I'm using the latest compat wireless (2014-09-26) from openwrt.
The wireless card is the WLE900VX from compex or DAXA-O1 from Unex.
The WRT1900AC have mimo 4x4 with 3 streams, and my wireless card have mimo 3x3 with 3 streams. Maybe that explains the difference.
Cedric Voncken.
> --
> Bartosz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "voncken" <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr>
To: "'Bartosz Markowski'" <bartosz.markowski@tieto.com>
Cc: "'Michal Kazior'" <michal.kazior@tieto.com>,
"'ath10k'" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"'linux-wireless'" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: ath10k firmware crash
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:05:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02f001cfe878$a64038e0$f2c0aaa0$@acksys.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKGw+H1QSvAL0Ri3HT6E_rhw=DhzDwj1XEeqwjwFkzJVQpz9Q@mail.gmail.com>
> > I did some tests with a linksys WRT1900AC and I have ~950 mbps OTA easily.
>
> You mean ath10k (STA) VS WRT1900AC get up ~950mbps?
> If so, could you say what's the HW, FW version you use?
>
My test platform is one WRT1900AC set in bridge mode with a computer.
If I use the WRT1900AC in AP mode with another computer, I have 950 mbps
If I use the cavium octon III dev plateform + ath10k driver in AP mode, I have around 700 mbps
I'm using the latest compat wireless (2014-09-26) from openwrt.
The wireless card is the WLE900VX from compex or DAXA-O1 from Unex.
The WRT1900AC have mimo 4x4 with 3 streams, and my wireless card have mimo 3x3 with 3 streams. Maybe that explains the difference.
Cedric Voncken.
> --
> Bartosz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-15 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-10 14:46 ath10k firmware crash Cedric VONCKEN
2014-10-10 14:46 ` Cedric VONCKEN
2014-10-13 5:46 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 5:46 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 7:35 ` voncken
2014-10-13 7:35 ` voncken
2014-10-13 7:54 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 7:54 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 9:20 ` voncken
2014-10-13 9:20 ` voncken
2014-10-13 9:25 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 9:25 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 12:00 ` voncken
2014-10-13 12:00 ` voncken
2014-10-13 14:06 ` voncken
2014-10-13 14:06 ` voncken
2014-10-13 9:23 ` voncken
2014-10-13 9:23 ` voncken
2014-10-13 9:30 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 9:30 ` Michal Kazior
2014-10-13 12:06 ` voncken
2014-10-13 12:06 ` voncken
2014-10-15 12:13 ` Bartosz Markowski
2014-10-15 12:13 ` Bartosz Markowski
2014-10-15 13:05 ` voncken [this message]
2014-10-15 13:05 ` voncken
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-02 20:19 Ath10k " Jamie
2025-01-09 13:08 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='02f001cfe878$a64038e0$f2c0aaa0$@acksys.fr' \
--to=cedric.voncken@acksys.fr \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bartosz.markowski@tieto.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.