All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:08:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ca7f92b-ec4e-469c-ad2b-648d278bcfe9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313150917.271086-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

On 3/13/26 16:09, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
>     commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
>     commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.

this wording kinda scared me, but after reading linked commits, there is
nothing to worry about, as there are no functional changes in this patch

Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>

> 
> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
> 
>     system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>     system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
> 
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index 252259993022..6b84e728d29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@ static void idpf_tx_read_tstamp(struct idpf_tx_queue *txq, struct sk_buff *skb)
>   		/* Fetch timestamp from completion descriptor through
>   		 * virtchnl msg to report to stack.
>   		 */
> -		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, txq->tstamp_task);
> +		queue_work(system_dfl_wq, txq->tstamp_task);
>   		break;
>   	}
>   


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:08:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ca7f92b-ec4e-469c-ad2b-648d278bcfe9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313150917.271086-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

On 3/13/26 16:09, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
>     commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
>     commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.

this wording kinda scared me, but after reading linked commits, there is
nothing to worry about, as there are no functional changes in this patch

Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>

> 
> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
> 
>     system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>     system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
> 
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index 252259993022..6b84e728d29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@ static void idpf_tx_read_tstamp(struct idpf_tx_queue *txq, struct sk_buff *skb)
>   		/* Fetch timestamp from completion descriptor through
>   		 * virtchnl msg to report to stack.
>   		 */
> -		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, txq->tstamp_task);
> +		queue_work(system_dfl_wq, txq->tstamp_task);
>   		break;
>   	}
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-13 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13 15:09 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-03-13 15:09 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-13 16:08 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2026-03-13 16:08   ` Przemek Kitszel
2026-03-14 16:10   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-14 16:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-16 16:58     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Tony Nguyen
2026-03-16 16:58       ` Tony Nguyen
2026-03-16 19:41       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-16 19:41         ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-31 16:22         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Salin, Samuel
2026-03-31 16:22           ` Salin, Samuel
2026-04-02 13:02   ` Marco Crivellari
2026-04-02 13:02     ` Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ca7f92b-ec4e-469c-ad2b-648d278bcfe9@intel.com \
    --to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.