All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:58:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878cd07a-b7fb-491a-9cec-8ddbab2bb13b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260314091048.235a6d0b@kernel.org>



On 3/14/2026 9:10 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:08:57 +0100 Przemek Kitszel wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> 
> Process question - even tho you are also a maintainer I only read
> Tony's tags as "please apply directly". LMK if that's right, I'll
> try to remember / make a note..

I talked to Przemek about this a little this morning. Since the 
Reviewed-by tag is used more prevalently in our process, perhaps an 
Acked-by could mean take this directly and the Reviewed-by keeps the 
same process of going through IWL. Other thought would be to explicitly 
ask/state for it to get taken directly. Open to other ideas as well if 
there's something else you'd prefer.

Thanks,
Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:58:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878cd07a-b7fb-491a-9cec-8ddbab2bb13b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260314091048.235a6d0b@kernel.org>



On 3/14/2026 9:10 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:08:57 +0100 Przemek Kitszel wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> 
> Process question - even tho you are also a maintainer I only read
> Tony's tags as "please apply directly". LMK if that's right, I'll
> try to remember / make a note..

I talked to Przemek about this a little this morning. Since the 
Reviewed-by tag is used more prevalently in our process, perhaps an 
Acked-by could mean take this directly and the Reviewed-by keeps the 
same process of going through IWL. Other thought would be to explicitly 
ask/state for it to get taken directly. Open to other ideas as well if 
there's something else you'd prefer.

Thanks,
Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13 15:09 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-03-13 15:09 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-13 16:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Przemek Kitszel
2026-03-13 16:08   ` Przemek Kitszel
2026-03-14 16:10   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-14 16:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-16 16:58     ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
2026-03-16 16:58       ` Tony Nguyen
2026-03-16 19:41       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-16 19:41         ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-31 16:22         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Salin, Samuel
2026-03-31 16:22           ` Salin, Samuel
2026-04-02 13:02   ` Marco Crivellari
2026-04-02 13:02     ` Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878cd07a-b7fb-491a-9cec-8ddbab2bb13b@intel.com \
    --to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.