From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: C99 Initialisers
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:18:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060654733.684.267.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030812020226.GA4688@zip.com.au>
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 19:02, CaT wrote:
> Is there any interest ins omeone 'fixing up' as many structs in the
> kernel from the form:
Yes, indeed, especially for 2.6. There has been a lot of work already in
this direction -- not too much should be left.
> And if so, what form should I feed it back in? Big patches? 1 patch
> per file? 1 per dir?
Whatever makes most sense. One per directory is probably OK for most
things.
> Main reaosn I'm asking is that it's slowly being done but isn't in
> the janitor list of things to do yet. If it were I'd just do it. ;)
It should be in the list.
Convert GNU-style to C99-style. I think converting unnamed initializers
to named initializers is a Good Thing, too.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-12 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-12 2:02 C99 Initialisers CaT
2003-08-12 2:18 ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-08-12 2:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-12 2:45 ` Robert Love
2003-08-12 2:57 ` Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
2003-08-12 5:38 ` Greg KH
2003-08-12 9:01 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-08-12 10:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-12 10:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-08-12 11:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-12 16:54 ` Ian Hastie
2003-08-12 18:01 ` Greg KH
2003-08-12 23:53 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-13 0:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-13 0:23 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 0:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-14 5:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-08-13 15:52 ` Timothy Miller
2003-08-13 17:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 0:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 0:14 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-13 0:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 0:37 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-13 0:49 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-13 1:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 3:02 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-13 3:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 10:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-13 17:31 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 17:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-13 17:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 18:02 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 18:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 18:38 ` Russell King
2003-08-13 19:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 19:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-13 20:15 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 20:16 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-13 20:30 ` Matt Domsch
2003-08-13 20:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 21:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 22:24 ` Roman Zippel
2003-08-14 20:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-14 10:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-14 10:25 ` Gene Heskett
2003-08-14 10:52 ` jw schultz
2003-08-14 12:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-14 12:57 ` Andrey Panin
2003-08-14 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-08-13 21:06 ` Russell King
2003-08-13 21:17 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2003-08-13 17:50 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 17:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-13 17:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-13 18:03 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 17:58 ` Greg KH
2003-08-13 18:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 18:09 ` Russell King
2003-08-13 20:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-13 21:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-13 21:26 ` Greg KH
2003-08-14 22:46 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-12 17:37 ` Dave Jones
2003-08-12 17:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-08-12 22:06 ` Ian Hastie
2003-08-13 15:54 ` CaT
2003-08-14 6:57 ` Maciej Soltysiak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-12 16:52 Shureih, Tariq
[not found] <jFFu.7t8.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jLKX.4KI.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRnj.2dx.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRwZ.2kJ.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRQi.2zQ.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jRZY.2Hw.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jS9J.2Np.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jUbt.57S.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jUuT.5kZ.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <k13k.22O.3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <k7Lq.7Gr.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-13 21:19 ` junkio
2003-08-13 22:18 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1060654733.684.267.camel@localhost \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=cat@zip.com.au \
--cc=kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.