From: Matthew Reppert <repp0017@tc.umn.edu>
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: Mike Bell <kernel@mikebell.org>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: devfs vs udev, thoughts from a devfs user
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:24:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1076451872.21728.25.camel@minerva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40293BEB.9010606@techsource.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 376 bytes --]
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 14:15, Timothy Miller wrote:
>
> If udev had a "devfs" mode where it used a ramdisk for device nodes, and
> it produced exactly the same names as devfs, would you be happy with it?
udev ships with several sets of device naming rules, one of which is
meant to create devfs-like names. etc/udev/udev.rules.devfs in the udev
distribution.
Matt
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-10 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-10 11:34 devfs vs udev, thoughts from a devfs user Mike Bell
2004-02-10 13:20 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-10 14:46 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 17:02 ` Mark Mielke
[not found] ` <20040210160011.GJ4421@tinyvaio.nome.ca>
2004-02-11 9:44 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-11 20:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-02-10 13:32 ` Ian Kent
2004-02-10 14:00 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 17:01 ` Greg KH
2004-02-10 17:13 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 17:25 ` Greg KH
2004-02-10 17:46 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 18:12 ` Greg KH
2004-02-10 18:29 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 22:19 ` Matthew Reppert
2004-02-11 1:10 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-11 10:05 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-13 21:19 ` Greg KH
2004-02-14 8:51 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-14 9:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2004-02-14 11:42 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-14 16:54 ` Greg KH
2004-02-14 17:44 ` Alex Goddard
2004-02-15 8:16 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-02-19 9:47 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-19 19:43 ` Greg KH
2004-02-27 0:02 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 19:10 ` Shawn
2004-02-10 17:52 ` Chris Friesen
2004-02-10 19:24 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 19:46 ` Chris Friesen
2004-02-10 19:58 ` Tomasz Torcz
2004-02-10 20:11 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-02-10 20:39 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-02-11 1:16 ` Greg KH
2004-02-11 1:41 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-02-11 9:36 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-02-11 7:50 ` viro
2004-02-11 12:33 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-02-11 15:11 ` [PATCH] Fix /etc/mtab updating with mount --move [was Re: devfs vs udev, thoughts from a devfs user] Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-02-11 19:19 ` devfs vs udev, thoughts from a devfs user dleonard
2004-02-10 20:32 ` Diego Calleja García
2004-02-11 1:20 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 20:15 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-10 22:24 ` Matthew Reppert [this message]
2004-02-11 1:35 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 20:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-10 17:55 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 18:19 ` Greg KH
2004-02-10 18:43 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 20:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-02-11 1:49 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-10 19:12 ` Mike Bell
2004-02-13 21:08 ` Greg KH
2004-02-10 18:35 ` Greg KH
2004-02-11 1:25 ` Ian Kent
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-10 16:10 "Andrey Borzenkov"
[not found] <fa.i9mtr77.1pja9qf@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.de6p9mb.1ikipbl@ifi.uio.no>
2004-02-13 22:08 ` walt
2004-02-13 22:18 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1076451872.21728.25.camel@minerva \
--to=repp0017@tc.umn.edu \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kernel@mikebell.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miller@techsource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.