From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Reiserfs Mailinglist <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 without problems?!
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:12:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101129125.18401.9.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41A0FA6F.5080905@namesys.com>
i have quite some machines running with 2.6.9-rc4-mmSomething, with
reiser4, running perfectly, (2 of them with reiser4 as root fs) they
have like 4 days in uptime, average. (since quite often there are
rebooted to test stuff in another install)
my workstation, reiser4 as storage, it runs perfect, no issues, i have
currently 2.6.10-rc2-mm2, since it came, no problems. (i plan on move to
reiser4 for root when i can bother repartition and start use lvm2)
a friends workstation has reiser4 rootfs, it has like 12 hours average
uptime :) he dont use his computer much, but no problems there..
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 12:28 -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> BLuEGoD wrote:
>
> > Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with reiser4, because I read that reiser4 comes without anything positive than others (that is because comes with "core" only).. If someone can set up for three or more days a system stable with reiser4 and 2.6.X kernel please tell me who!
> >
> >P.D. Personally, I think kernel 2.6.8 has better stability than 2.6.9 :)
> >
> >
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE, LinuxWaves.com Email Now! --> http://www.LinuxWaves.com
> >Join Linux Discussions! --> http://Community.LinuxWaves.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> It seems like the most recent reiser4 is not as stable as past ones. It
> is the weekend, let's give vs a few days to fix things starting on monday.
>
--
Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-22 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-21 20:12 reiser4 without problems?! BLuEGoD
2004-11-21 20:28 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-22 13:12 ` Redeeman [this message]
2004-11-21 20:41 ` mjt
2004-11-22 3:09 ` Thomas Graham
2004-11-22 3:00 ` Cal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1101129125.18401.9.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.