* reiser4 without problems?!
@ 2004-11-21 20:12 BLuEGoD
2004-11-21 20:28 ` Hans Reiser
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: BLuEGoD @ 2004-11-21 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with reiser4, because I read that reiser4 comes without anything positive than others (that is because comes with "core" only).. If someone can set up for three or more days a system stable with reiser4 and 2.6.X kernel please tell me who!
P.D. Personally, I think kernel 2.6.8 has better stability than 2.6.9 :)
_____________________________________________________________
Get your FREE, LinuxWaves.com Email Now! --> http://www.LinuxWaves.com
Join Linux Discussions! --> http://Community.LinuxWaves.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: reiser4 without problems?! 2004-11-21 20:12 reiser4 without problems?! BLuEGoD @ 2004-11-21 20:28 ` Hans Reiser 2004-11-22 13:12 ` Redeeman 2004-11-21 20:41 ` mjt 2004-11-22 3:00 ` Cal 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Hans Reiser @ 2004-11-21 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bluegod; +Cc: reiserfs-list BLuEGoD wrote: > Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with reiser4, because I read that reiser4 comes without anything positive than others (that is because comes with "core" only).. If someone can set up for three or more days a system stable with reiser4 and 2.6.X kernel please tell me who! > >P.D. Personally, I think kernel 2.6.8 has better stability than 2.6.9 :) > > > >_____________________________________________________________ >Get your FREE, LinuxWaves.com Email Now! --> http://www.LinuxWaves.com >Join Linux Discussions! --> http://Community.LinuxWaves.com > > > > It seems like the most recent reiser4 is not as stable as past ones. It is the weekend, let's give vs a few days to fix things starting on monday. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: reiser4 without problems?! 2004-11-21 20:28 ` Hans Reiser @ 2004-11-22 13:12 ` Redeeman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Redeeman @ 2004-11-22 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Reiserfs Mailinglist i have quite some machines running with 2.6.9-rc4-mmSomething, with reiser4, running perfectly, (2 of them with reiser4 as root fs) they have like 4 days in uptime, average. (since quite often there are rebooted to test stuff in another install) my workstation, reiser4 as storage, it runs perfect, no issues, i have currently 2.6.10-rc2-mm2, since it came, no problems. (i plan on move to reiser4 for root when i can bother repartition and start use lvm2) a friends workstation has reiser4 rootfs, it has like 12 hours average uptime :) he dont use his computer much, but no problems there.. On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 12:28 -0800, Hans Reiser wrote: > BLuEGoD wrote: > > > Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with reiser4, because I read that reiser4 comes without anything positive than others (that is because comes with "core" only).. If someone can set up for three or more days a system stable with reiser4 and 2.6.X kernel please tell me who! > > > >P.D. Personally, I think kernel 2.6.8 has better stability than 2.6.9 :) > > > > > > > >_____________________________________________________________ > >Get your FREE, LinuxWaves.com Email Now! --> http://www.LinuxWaves.com > >Join Linux Discussions! --> http://Community.LinuxWaves.com > > > > > > > > > It seems like the most recent reiser4 is not as stable as past ones. It > is the weekend, let's give vs a few days to fix things starting on monday. > -- Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: reiser4 without problems?! 2004-11-21 20:12 reiser4 without problems?! BLuEGoD 2004-11-21 20:28 ` Hans Reiser @ 2004-11-21 20:41 ` mjt 2004-11-22 3:09 ` Thomas Graham 2004-11-22 3:00 ` Cal 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: mjt @ 2004-11-21 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: BLuEGoD; +Cc: reiserfs-list On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:12:02PM -0800, BLuEGoD wrote: > > Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there > is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm > patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with Apart from my recent issues, which I just realized others have reported as well, the -cko series has been the best for me, and unfortunately the -rc2-mm2 crashes even worse for me (if I turn debug on), so it'll take a while before I can say anything more. Reiser4progs is still in Debian, so that's nothing. > reiser4, because I read that reiser4 comes without anything positive than > others (that is because comes with "core" only).. If someone can set up for > three or more days a system stable with reiser4 and 2.6.X kernel please tell > me who! I just used debootstrap to install from a small partition which I still have as reiserfs. It's not a big issue to install it yourself. -- mjt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: reiser4 without problems?! 2004-11-21 20:41 ` mjt @ 2004-11-22 3:09 ` Thomas Graham 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Graham @ 2004-11-22 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Markus Törnqvist; +Cc: reiserfs-list I don't have so much problem as using it as a storage FS, I use reiser3 for my root filesystem, couldn't trust that, I wouldn't give it a risk such as apache bugs before, pretty unstable tho, I have a 200GB and a 160GB HD using as non-root folder for storage, nothing crash but the repacker sucks, Hans seems giveup on repacker idea, well, what's next ? > On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:12:02PM -0800, BLuEGoD wrote: >> >> Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, >> there >> is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with >> -mm >> patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with > > Apart from my recent issues, which I just realized others have reported > as well, the -cko series has been the best for me, and unfortunately > the -rc2-mm2 crashes even worse for me (if I turn debug on), so it'll > take a while before I can say anything more. > > Reiser4progs is still in Debian, so that's nothing. > >> reiser4, because I read that reiser4 comes without anything positive >> than >> others (that is because comes with "core" only).. If someone can set up >> for >> three or more days a system stable with reiser4 and 2.6.X kernel please >> tell >> me who! > > I just used debootstrap to install from a small partition which I still > have as reiserfs. > > It's not a big issue to install it yourself. > > -- > mjt > > -- HK Celtic Orchestra leader and coordanator: Thomas Graham Lau Phone number: 852-93239670 (24hours a day, 7days a week non-stop phone) Web site: http://sml.dyndns.org Email: lkthomas@sml.dyndns.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: reiser4 without problems?! 2004-11-21 20:12 reiser4 without problems?! BLuEGoD 2004-11-21 20:28 ` Hans Reiser 2004-11-21 20:41 ` mjt @ 2004-11-22 3:00 ` Cal 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Cal @ 2004-11-22 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bluegod; +Cc: reiserfs-list ---------- and then at Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:12:02 -0800, it was written ... > > Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went > out, there is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if > any kernel with -mm patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all > people are losing time with reiser4, because I read that reiser4 > comes without anything positive than others (that is because comes > with"core" only).. If someone can set up for three or more days a > system stable with reiser4 and 2.6.X kernel please tell me who! Me!! I switched two systems to reiser4 a couple of weeks ago, and they're rock solid (with 2.6.9-cko3). So there's a few problems emerging in the rc2-mm series - that shouldn't shock anyone! That's why "release candidates" and the testing kernel series exist. Stability is available where you need it. cheers, Cal ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-22 13:12 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-11-21 20:12 reiser4 without problems?! BLuEGoD 2004-11-21 20:28 ` Hans Reiser 2004-11-22 13:12 ` Redeeman 2004-11-21 20:41 ` mjt 2004-11-22 3:09 ` Thomas Graham 2004-11-22 3:00 ` Cal
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.