From: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>, bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:08:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <112700000.1035853724@w-hlinder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210281708120.966-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
--On Monday, October 28, 2002 17:13:53 -0800 Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, bert hubert wrote:
>
>> Ok, so that is two things that need to be in the manpage and probably in
>> bold:
>>
>> 1) epoll only works on pipes and sockets
>> (not on tty, not on files)
>>
>> 2) epoll must be used on non-blocking sockets only
>> (and describe the race that happens otherwise)
>>
>> If you send me the source of your manpages I'll work it in if you want.
>
> No problem ...
>
If you need any help with the Man pages I will be glad to
help too. It looks like providing examples of how to use it would be
very useful since this is something application writers are supposed
to use...
> events after you received EAGAIN or after accept/connect". And the fact on
> using the fd immediately after an accept/connect is enforced by two very
> likely facts :
>
> 1) on accept() it's very likely that the first packet brough you something
> more than SYN
>
> 2) on connect() you have the full I/O write space available
Do you think these should be mentioned explicitly?
Thanks a lot.
Hanna
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-29 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-28 19:14 [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Hanna Linder
2002-10-28 20:10 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-28 20:56 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-28 22:02 ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:15 ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:17 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:08 ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:12 ` [Lse-tech] " Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-28 22:37 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:58 ` and nicer too - " bert hubert
2002-10-28 23:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 23:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 0:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 1:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 5:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 11:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 0:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:03 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 0:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 1:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-28 23:45 ` and nicer too - " John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29 0:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 12:59 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-29 15:19 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 22:54 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-30 2:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 19:38 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-31 5:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:18 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 0:32 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:40 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 0:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:53 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 1:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 1:08 ` Hanna Linder [this message]
2002-10-29 1:39 ` [Lse-tech] " Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 2:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 2:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 4:01 ` [PATCH] Updated sys_epoll now with man pages Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-29 5:28 ` [Lse-tech] " Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 5:47 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 5:41 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 6:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 6:03 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 6:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 14:59 ` Paul Larson
2002-10-29 5:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 7:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 11:04 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 15:30 ` [Lse-tech] " Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-29 17:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 19:30 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 19:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 13:09 ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll bert hubert
2002-10-29 21:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 21:23 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 21:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 23:06 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 23:14 ` [Lse-tech] " Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 23:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 1:47 ` Security critical race condition in epoll code John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29 2:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 3:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 19:49 ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29 21:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 0:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 2:09 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 5:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 2:22 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-30 3:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 2:07 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-31 3:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 11:10 ` [Lse-tech] " Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-10-31 18:42 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 23:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 23:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 0:52 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 4:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 15:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 19:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 17:42 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 17:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 18:41 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 19:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 20:04 ` Charlie Krasic
2002-11-01 20:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 20:22 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-31 15:41 ` Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 15:48 ` bert hubert
2002-10-31 16:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 22:00 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-01 0:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 13:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 20:28 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 23:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 1:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 2:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 17:36 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 20:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 1:55 ` Matthew D. Hall
2002-11-01 2:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 18:18 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 2:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 4:29 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-01 4:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 23:27 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-11-02 4:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-02 15:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-05 18:15 ` pipe POLLOUT oddity John Gardiner Myers
2002-11-05 18:18 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-01 23:16 ` Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-30 18:59 ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Zach Brown
2002-10-30 19:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 16:54 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=112700000.1035853724@w-hlinder \
--to=hannal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.