All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Gardiner Myers <jgmyers@netscape.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Security critical race condition in epoll code
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:47:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DBDE8AF.6090102@netscape.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021028220809.GB27798@outpost.ds9a.nl>

There appears to be a race condition in the epoll patch which permits 
user space to scribble in the kernel's free memory.

First a user space program creates an epoll fd and adds a socket to it 
using sys_epoll_ctl(...EP_CTL_ADD...)

Then the program creates two threads, A and B.  Simultaneously, A calls 
sys_epoll_ctl(...EP_CTL_MOD...) and B calls 
sys_epoll_ctl(...EP_CTL_DEL...) on the socket that was previously added.

Thread A runs up through the point where ep_find() returns the (struct 
epitem *) for the socket.

Thread B then runs and ep_remove() frees the (struct epitem *).

Thread A then runs some more and stores the value of events into the now 
freed block of memory pointed to by dpi.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-29  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-28 19:14 [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Hanna Linder
2002-10-28 20:10 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-28 20:56 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-28 22:02   ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:15     ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:17   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:08 ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:12   ` [Lse-tech] " Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-28 22:37     ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:29   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:58     ` and nicer too - " bert hubert
2002-10-28 23:23       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 23:44     ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29  0:02       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  1:51         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29  5:06           ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 11:20             ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30  0:16               ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  0:03       ` bert hubert
2002-10-29  0:20         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  0:48         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29  1:53           ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-28 23:45   ` and nicer too - " John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29  0:08     ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 12:59       ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-29 15:19         ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 22:54           ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-30  2:24             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 19:38               ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-31  5:04                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  0:18     ` bert hubert
2002-10-29  0:32       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  0:40         ` bert hubert
2002-10-29  0:57           ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  0:53             ` bert hubert
2002-10-29  1:13               ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  1:08                 ` [Lse-tech] " Hanna Linder
2002-10-29  1:39                   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  2:05               ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29  2:44                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  4:01                   ` [PATCH] Updated sys_epoll now with man pages Hanna Linder
2002-10-29  5:09                     ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-29  5:28                       ` [Lse-tech] " Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29  5:47                         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  5:41                           ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29  6:12                             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  6:03                               ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29  6:23                                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 14:59                         ` Paul Larson
2002-10-29  5:31                       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  7:34                       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 11:04                       ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 15:30                       ` [Lse-tech] " Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-29 17:45                         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 19:30                           ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 19:49                             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 13:09             ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll bert hubert
2002-10-29 21:25               ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 21:23                 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 21:41                   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 23:06                     ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 23:14                       ` [Lse-tech] " Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 23:25                       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  1:47   ` John Gardiner Myers [this message]
2002-10-29  2:13     ` Security critical race condition in epoll code Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29  3:38     ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 19:49   ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29 21:03     ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30  0:26       ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30  2:09         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30  5:51         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30  2:22       ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-30  3:51         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31  2:07           ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-31  3:21             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 11:10               ` [Lse-tech] " Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-10-31 18:42                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 23:01         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 23:53           ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31  0:52             ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31  4:15               ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 15:07                 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 19:10                   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 17:42                     ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 17:45                       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 18:41                         ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 19:16                       ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 20:04                         ` Charlie Krasic
2002-11-01 20:14                           ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 20:22                         ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-31 15:41                 ` Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 15:48                   ` bert hubert
2002-10-31 16:45                   ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 22:00                     ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-01  0:32                       ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 13:23                       ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 20:28                   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 23:02                     ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01  1:01                       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01  2:01                         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 17:36                           ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 20:45                         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01  1:55                       ` Matthew D. Hall
2002-11-01  2:54                         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 18:18                           ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01  2:56                         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01  4:29                       ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-01  4:59                         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 23:27                       ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-11-02  4:55                         ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-02 15:41                         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-05 18:15                       ` pipe POLLOUT oddity John Gardiner Myers
2002-11-05 18:18                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-01 23:16                   ` Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-30 18:59       ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Zach Brown
2002-10-30 19:25         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 16:54         ` Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DBDE8AF.6090102@netscape.com \
    --to=jgmyers@netscape.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.