From: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
Cc: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidel@xmailserver.org,
linux-aio@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:12:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DBDB664.7050808@watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021028220809.GB27798@outpost.ds9a.nl
bert hubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:14:19AM -0800, Hanna Linder wrote:
>
>
>> The results of our testing show not only does the system call
>>interface to epoll perform as well as the /dev interface but also that epoll
>>is many times better than standard poll. No other implementations of poll
>
>
> Hanna,
>
> Sure that this works? The following trivial program doesn't work on stdinput
> when I'd expect it to. It just waits until the timeout passes end then
> returns 0. It also does not work on a file, which is to be expected,
> although 'select' returns with an immediate availability of data on a file
> according to SuS.
I'm checking this and will let you know.
> Furthermore, there is some const weirdness going on, the ephttpd server has
> a different second argument to sys_epoll_wait.
You're right. The ephttpd server on Davide's page needs to add a cast
(struct pollfd const **) to the second arg passed to sys_epoll_wait.
The version of dphttpd used to generate the results had that fix in it.
-- Shailabh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-28 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-28 19:14 [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Hanna Linder
2002-10-28 20:10 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-28 20:56 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-28 22:02 ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:15 ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:17 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:08 ` bert hubert
2002-10-28 22:12 ` Shailabh Nagar [this message]
2002-10-28 22:37 ` [Lse-tech] " Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:58 ` and nicer too - " bert hubert
2002-10-28 23:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 23:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 0:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 1:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 5:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 11:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 0:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:03 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 0:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 1:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-28 23:45 ` and nicer too - " John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29 0:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 12:59 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-29 15:19 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 22:54 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-30 2:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 19:38 ` Martin Waitz
2002-10-31 5:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:18 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 0:32 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:40 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 0:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 0:53 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 1:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 1:08 ` [Lse-tech] " Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 1:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 2:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-29 2:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 4:01 ` [PATCH] Updated sys_epoll now with man pages Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-29 5:28 ` [Lse-tech] " Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 5:47 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 5:41 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 6:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 6:03 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 6:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 14:59 ` Paul Larson
2002-10-29 5:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 7:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 11:04 ` bert hubert
2002-10-29 15:30 ` [Lse-tech] " Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-29 17:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 19:30 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 19:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 13:09 ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll bert hubert
2002-10-29 21:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 21:23 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 21:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 23:06 ` Hanna Linder
2002-10-29 23:14 ` [Lse-tech] " Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-29 23:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 1:47 ` Security critical race condition in epoll code John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29 2:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 3:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-29 19:49 ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-29 21:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 0:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 2:09 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 5:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 2:22 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-30 3:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 2:07 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-31 3:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 11:10 ` [Lse-tech] " Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-10-31 18:42 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-30 23:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-30 23:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 0:52 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 4:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 15:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 19:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 17:42 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 17:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 18:41 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 19:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 20:04 ` Charlie Krasic
2002-11-01 20:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 20:22 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-31 15:41 ` Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) Jamie Lokier
2002-10-31 15:48 ` bert hubert
2002-10-31 16:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 22:00 ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-01 0:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 13:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-31 20:28 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 23:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 1:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 2:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 17:36 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 20:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 1:55 ` Matthew D. Hall
2002-11-01 2:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-01 18:18 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-01 2:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 4:29 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-01 4:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-01 23:27 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-11-02 4:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-02 15:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-05 18:15 ` pipe POLLOUT oddity John Gardiner Myers
2002-11-05 18:18 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-01 23:16 ` Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll) John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-30 18:59 ` and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Zach Brown
2002-10-30 19:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-31 16:54 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DBDB664.7050808@watson.ibm.com \
--to=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=hannal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-aio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.