From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
bjornw@axis.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
benedict.gaster@superh.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>,
Joe Taylor <joe@tensilica.com>,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
rth@twiddle.net, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux390@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:51:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145325083.17085.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604171647330.31773@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:48 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > So now we can focus on a better solution.
>
> Could you have a look at Kiran's work?
>
> Maybe one result of your work could be that the existing indirection
> for alloc_percpu could be avoided?
Sure, I'll spend some time looking at what others have done and see
what I can put together. I'm also very busy on other stuff at the
moment, so this will be something I do more on the side. Don't think
there's a rush here, but I stated in a previous post, I probably wont
have something out for a month or two.
-- Steve
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
bjornw@axis.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
benedict.gaster@superh.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>,
Joe Taylor <joe@tensilica.com>,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
rth@twiddle.net, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux390@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:51:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145325083.17085.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604171647330.31773@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:48 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > So now we can focus on a better solution.
>
> Could you have a look at Kiran's work?
>
> Maybe one result of your work could be that the existing indirection
> for alloc_percpu could be avoided?
Sure, I'll spend some time looking at what others have done and see
what I can put together. I'm also very busy on other stuff at the
moment, so this will be something I do more on the side. Don't think
there's a rush here, but I stated in a previous post, I probably wont
have something out for a month or two.
-- Steve
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
spyro@f2s.com, Joe Taylor <joe@tensilica.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
benedict.gaster@superh.com, bjornw@axis.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
grundler@parisc-linux.org, starvik@axis.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rth@twiddle.net, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
tony.luck@intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ralf@linux-mips.org, Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>,
lethal@linux-sh.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:51:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145325083.17085.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604171647330.31773@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 16:48 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > So now we can focus on a better solution.
>
> Could you have a look at Kiran's work?
>
> Maybe one result of your work could be that the existing indirection
> for alloc_percpu could be avoided?
Sure, I'll spend some time looking at what others have done and see
what I can put together. I'm also very busy on other stuff at the
moment, so this will be something I do more on the side. Don't think
there's a rush here, but I stated in a previous post, I probably wont
have something out for a month or two.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-18 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-14 21:18 [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 3:10 ` [PATCH 00/08] robust per_cpu allocation for modules - V2 Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 5:32 ` [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules Nick Piggin
2006-04-15 5:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-15 5:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-15 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 2:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 2:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 2:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 3:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 3:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 3:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 7:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 7:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 7:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-16 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-16 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-16 18:03 ` Tony Luck
2006-04-16 18:03 ` Tony Luck
2006-04-16 18:03 ` Tony Luck
2006-04-17 0:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 0:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 0:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 2:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-17 2:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-17 2:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-17 2:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 2:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 2:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 20:06 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 20:06 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 20:06 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 6:47 ` Rusty Russell
2006-04-17 6:47 ` Rusty Russell
2006-04-17 6:47 ` Rusty Russell
2006-04-17 11:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 11:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 11:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-17 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-17 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-17 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 22:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 22:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 22:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 23:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 23:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 23:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 23:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 23:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 23:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-18 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2006-04-18 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-18 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-18 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-18 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 6:35 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 6:35 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 6:35 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1145325083.17085.37.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benedict.gaster@superh.com \
--cc=bjornw@axis.com \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=joe@tensilica.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc@tensilica.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.