From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
bjornw@axis.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
benedict.gaster@superh.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>,
Joe Taylor <joe@tensilica.com>,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
rth@twiddle.net, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux390@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:42:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44448A60.4040903@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604171936040.24264@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Understood, but I'm going to start looking in the way Rusty and Arnd
> suggested with the vmalloc approach. This would allow for saving of
> memory and dynamic allocation of module memory making it more robust. And
> all this without that evil extra indirection!
Remember that this approach could effectively just move the indirection to
the TLB / page tables (well, I say "moves" because large kernel mappings
are effectively free compared with 4K mappings).
So be careful about coding up a large amount of work before unleashing it:
I doubt you'll be able to find a solution that doesn't involve tradeoffs
somewhere (but wohoo if you can).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
bjornw@axis.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
benedict.gaster@superh.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>,
Joe Taylor <joe@tensilica.com>,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
rth@twiddle.net, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux390@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:42:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44448A60.4040903@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604171936040.24264@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Understood, but I'm going to start looking in the way Rusty and Arnd
> suggested with the vmalloc approach. This would allow for saving of
> memory and dynamic allocation of module memory making it more robust. And
> all this without that evil extra indirection!
Remember that this approach could effectively just move the indirection to
the TLB / page tables (well, I say "moves" because large kernel mappings
are effectively free compared with 4K mappings).
So be careful about coding up a large amount of work before unleashing it:
I doubt you'll be able to find a solution that doesn't involve tradeoffs
somewhere (but wohoo if you can).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
spyro@f2s.com, Joe Taylor <joe@tensilica.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
benedict.gaster@superh.com, bjornw@axis.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
grundler@parisc-linux.org, starvik@axis.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rth@twiddle.net, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
tony.luck@intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ralf@linux-mips.org, Marc Gauthier <marc@tensilica.com>,
lethal@linux-sh.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:42:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44448A60.4040903@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604171936040.24264@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Understood, but I'm going to start looking in the way Rusty and Arnd
> suggested with the vmalloc approach. This would allow for saving of
> memory and dynamic allocation of module memory making it more robust. And
> all this without that evil extra indirection!
Remember that this approach could effectively just move the indirection to
the TLB / page tables (well, I say "moves" because large kernel mappings
are effectively free compared with 4K mappings).
So be careful about coding up a large amount of work before unleashing it:
I doubt you'll be able to find a solution that doesn't involve tradeoffs
somewhere (but wohoo if you can).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-18 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-14 21:18 [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 21:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-14 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-14 22:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 3:10 ` [PATCH 00/08] robust per_cpu allocation for modules - V2 Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 3:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 5:32 ` [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules Nick Piggin
2006-04-15 5:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-15 5:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-15 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-15 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 2:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 2:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 2:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 3:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 3:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 3:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 7:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 7:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 7:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 13:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-16 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-16 14:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-16 15:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-16 18:03 ` Tony Luck
2006-04-16 18:03 ` Tony Luck
2006-04-16 18:03 ` Tony Luck
2006-04-17 0:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 0:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 0:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 2:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-17 2:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-17 2:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-04-17 2:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 2:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 2:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 20:06 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 20:06 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 20:06 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 6:47 ` Rusty Russell
2006-04-17 6:47 ` Rusty Russell
2006-04-17 6:47 ` Rusty Russell
2006-04-17 11:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 11:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 11:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-16 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-17 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-17 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-17 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 22:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 22:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 22:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 23:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 23:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 23:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-17 23:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 23:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-17 23:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-18 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 6:42 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-04-18 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-18 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-18 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-18 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-16 6:35 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 6:35 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-16 6:35 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44448A60.4040903@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benedict.gaster@superh.com \
--cc=bjornw@axis.com \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=joe@tensilica.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc@tensilica.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.