From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: "Andy Gospodarek" <andy@greyhouse.net>
Cc: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
shawvrana@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: e1000_down and tx_timeout worker race cleaning the transmit buffers
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:28:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145633287.3194.10.camel@rh4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060421132758.GA26161@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 09:27 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>
> Isn't the only possibility for a linkwatch deadlock when the
> __LINK_STATE_LINKWATCH_PENDING but is set in dev->state?
This device that you're about to close may be on the linkwatch list, or
other devices may also be on the linkwatch list. As long as
linkwatch_event is in front of your driver's task on the same workqueue,
it will deadlock.
>
> Off the top of my head...
>
> Would it be interesting to change the calls for flush_scheduled_work()
> to a new function net_flush_scheduled_work() with the intent on
> eventually creating new a new work queue but temporarily just checking
> to make sure there are no linkwatch events pending and if there are
> allowing them to run first before calling flush_scheduled_work()?
>
Using the same workqueue and holding the rtnl_lock, I'm not sure how you
can let linkwatch_event run first without deadlocking.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-21 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200604201035.00100.shaw@vranix.com>
2006-04-20 23:36 ` e1000_down and tx_timeout worker race cleaning the transmit buffers Herbert Xu
2006-04-20 23:51 ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-20 22:36 ` Michael Chan
2006-04-21 1:27 ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-21 1:33 ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-21 0:10 ` Michael Chan
2006-04-21 2:37 ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-21 2:40 ` Herbert Xu
2006-04-21 1:24 ` Michael Chan
2006-04-21 13:27 ` Andy Gospodarek
2006-04-21 15:28 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2006-04-21 20:01 ` Andy Gospodarek
2006-04-21 19:00 ` Michael Chan
2006-04-21 20:46 ` Andy Gospodarek
2006-04-27 0:14 ` Shaw
2006-04-27 4:55 ` Auke Kok
2006-04-29 21:57 ` Shaw Vrana
2006-04-21 2:42 ` Shaw Vrana
2006-04-21 1:33 ` Michael Chan
2006-04-21 3:05 ` shaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1145633287.3194.10.camel@rh4 \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawvrana@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.