From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Florian Paul Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:36:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147538182.7562.2.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0605131137070.27751@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:39 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Careful, rt21 has a bug slipped in that might have funny results on SMP
> machines:
>
> + if (!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
> + set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
>
> John (although he later fixed it) added a ; after the if. But the fix is
> not yet in Ingo's patch.
I saw that go by, and fixed it before building. Mine is a UP build
anyway.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-13 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-13 2:24 rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data Darren Hart
2006-05-13 9:20 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2006-05-13 11:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-13 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-13 16:36 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-05-15 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-13 18:06 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-13 18:21 ` Lee Revell
2006-05-13 23:01 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-14 3:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-14 5:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-14 7:04 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-14 7:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 8:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-16 1:30 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-16 7:22 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 9:14 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-18 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18 8:44 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18 8:58 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18 9:18 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 9:38 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-18 9:58 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-19 5:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-19 5:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 5:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 16:52 ` Lee Revell
2006-05-15 11:20 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-15 21:49 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-15 11:15 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-15 14:34 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1147538182.7562.2.camel@homer \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.