All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:13:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060515081341.GB24523@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605131601.31880.dvhltc@us.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1237 bytes --]


* Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Saturday 13 May 2006 11:21, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > >      1 [softirq-timer/0]
> >
> > What happens if you set the softirq-timer threads to 99?
> >
> 
> After setting all 4 softirq-timer threads to prio 99 I seemed to get 
> only 2 failures in 100 runs. #51 slept too long (10ms too long!), the 
> latency appeared after the sleep in #90 (nearly 483ms worth).  Those 
> latencies seem huge to me.

have you tried to use the latency tracer to capture this latency? It is 
programmable to a high degree. (I've attached trace-it.c that shows how 
to use it)

(If the latency is particularly long you might want to increase 
kernel/latency.c:MAX_TRACE.)

once you have a latency trace, you can use grep to produce some 
highlevel overview of what's happening. E.g. syscall activity:

	grep ' [<>] ' latency_trace.txt

or context-switches done:

        grep ' : __schedule <' latency_trace

looking at the highlevel traces should give you a quick idea of what's 
going on, and then you can zoom into the time period that triggers the 
long latency. (but feel free to also send these traces to us, preferably 
in bzip2 -9 format.)

	Ingo

[-- Attachment #2: trace-it.c --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2375 bytes --]


/*
 * Copyright (C) 2005, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
 *
 * user-triggered tracing.
 *
 * The -rt kernel has a built-in kernel tracer, which will trace
 * all kernel function calls (and a couple of special events as well),
 * by using a build-time gcc feature that instruments all kernel
 * functions.
 * 
 * The tracer is highly automated for a number of latency tracing purposes,
 * but it can also be switched into 'user-triggered' mode, which is a
 * half-automatic tracing mode where userspace apps start and stop the
 * tracer. This file shows a dumb example how to turn user-triggered
 * tracing on, and how to start/stop tracing. Note that if you do
 * multiple start/stop sequences, the kernel will do a maximum search
 * over their latencies, and will keep the trace of the largest latency
 * in /proc/latency_trace. The maximums are also reported to the kernel
 * log. (but can also be read from /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency)
 *
 * For the tracer to be activated, turn on CONFIG_WAKEUP_TIMING and
 * CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE in the .config, rebuild the kernel and boot
 * into it. Note that the tracer can have significant runtime overhead,
 * so you dont want to use it for performance testing :)
 */

#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>

int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
	int ret;

	if (getuid() != 0) {
		fprintf(stderr, "needs to run as root.\n");
		exit(1);
	}
	ret = system("cat /proc/sys/kernel/mcount_enabled >/dev/null 2>/dev/null");
	if (ret) {
		fprintf(stderr, "CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACING not enabled?\n");
		exit(1);
	}
	system("echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_all_cpus");
	system("echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_enabled");
	system("echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_freerunning");
	system("echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_print_at_crash");
	system("echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_user_triggered");
	system("echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/trace_verbose");
	system("echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency");
	system("echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_thresh");
	system("[ -e /proc/sys/kernel/wakeup_timing ] && echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/wakeup_timing");
	system("echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/mcount_enabled");

	gettimeofday(0, 1); // start tracing
	usleep(100000);
	gettimeofday(0, 0); // stop tracing

	system("cat /proc/latency_trace");

	return 0;
}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-15  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-13  2:24 rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data Darren Hart
2006-05-13  9:20 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2006-05-13 11:55   ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-13 15:39     ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-13 16:36       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15  8:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-13 18:06   ` Darren Hart
2006-05-13 18:21     ` Lee Revell
2006-05-13 23:01       ` Darren Hart
2006-05-14  3:46         ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-14  5:48           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-14  7:04             ` Darren Hart
2006-05-14  7:38               ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15  8:13         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-05-16  1:30           ` Darren Hart
2006-05-16  7:22             ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18  9:14               ` Darren Hart
2006-05-18 11:24                 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18  8:44             ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18  8:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18  8:58                 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18  8:56                   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18  9:18                     ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18  9:38                   ` Darren Hart
2006-05-18  9:58                     ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-19  5:48                     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-19  5:58                       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15  5:43     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 16:52       ` Lee Revell
2006-05-15 11:20     ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-15 21:49       ` Darren Hart
2006-05-15 11:15 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-15 14:34   ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060515081341.GB24523@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.