From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 05:46:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147578414.7738.11.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605131601.31880.dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 16:01 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Saturday 13 May 2006 11:21, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > 1 [softirq-timer/0]
> >
> > What happens if you set the softirq-timer threads to 99?
> >
>
> After setting all 4 softirq-timer threads to prio 99 I seemed to get only 2
> failures in 100 runs.
If you disable printf + fflush in iterations loop, problem goes away?
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-14 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-13 2:24 rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data Darren Hart
2006-05-13 9:20 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2006-05-13 11:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-13 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-13 16:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-13 18:06 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-13 18:21 ` Lee Revell
2006-05-13 23:01 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-14 3:46 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-05-14 5:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-14 7:04 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-14 7:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 8:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-16 1:30 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-16 7:22 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 9:14 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-18 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18 8:44 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18 8:58 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-18 9:18 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-18 9:38 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-18 9:58 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-19 5:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-19 5:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 5:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-05-15 16:52 ` Lee Revell
2006-05-15 11:20 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-15 21:49 ` Darren Hart
2006-05-15 11:15 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-05-15 14:34 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1147578414.7738.11.camel@homer \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.