From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/devices/: remove dead _ecc code
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:24:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150928664.25491.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060621215840.GP9111@stusta.de>
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 23:58 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes some code that is dead code after the
> "Remove read/write _ecc variants" patch that went into Linus' tree.
Holy cow, are you even remotly knowing what you are doing ?
Removing the xxx_ecc function pointers from the mtd structs does not
remove the fundamental requirement of ECC for NAND FLASH.
I'm just waiting for the follow up patches which remove nand_ecc and the
reed solomon library.
When you're done with those, please remove NAND support entirely.
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Debunked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/devices/: remove dead _ecc code
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:24:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150928664.25491.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060621215840.GP9111@stusta.de>
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 23:58 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes some code that is dead code after the
> "Remove read/write _ecc variants" patch that went into Linus' tree.
Holy cow, are you even remotly knowing what you are doing ?
Removing the xxx_ecc function pointers from the mtd structs does not
remove the fundamental requirement of ECC for NAND FLASH.
I'm just waiting for the follow up patches which remove nand_ecc and the
reed solomon library.
When you're done with those, please remove NAND support entirely.
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Debunked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-21 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-21 21:58 [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/devices/: remove dead _ecc code Adrian Bunk
2006-06-21 22:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-06-21 22:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-27 13:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-06-27 13:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-06-28 7:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-28 7:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1150928664.25491.34.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.