From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Robert Crocombe <rcrocomb@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 12:04:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154621059.32264.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6babb600608030848p4446cb8emff58519d62deb9d8@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:48 -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
> I am sad.
Cheer up... It's OK ;)
>
> Okay, I couldn't use that same machine, which had to be swapped with
> something else, but I have a very similar machine (32GB vs 8GB of
> RAM, 1 additional video card and some extra 1394b cards) which hit the
> same problem. The trace from it is:
Are you also getting any warnings or BUG reports before this. In your
other dmesg, it should a bug being reported. This could cause problems
later on.
That said, this is starting to look like a NUMA problem. So I would like
to know where that lock is being taken exactly.
>
> md0_raid1/1118[CPU#3]: BUG in debug_rt_mutex_unlock at
> kernel/rtmutex-debug.c:471
>
> Call Trace:
> <ffffffff80487453>{_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+34}
> <ffffffff8022cc03>{__WARN_ON+105}
> <ffffffff8022cbbe>{__WARN_ON+36}
> <ffffffff8024880b>{debug_rt_mutex_unlock+204}
> <ffffffff80486621>{rt_lock_slowunlock+30}
> <ffffffff80487196>{__lock_text_start+14}
> <ffffffff802792f9>{kmem_cache_alloc+207}
> <ffffffff8025b394>{mempool_alloc_slab+22}
> <ffffffff8025b783>{mempool_alloc+80}
> <ffffffff80248e35>{constant_test_bit+9}
> <ffffffff80487960>{_raw_spin_unlock+51}
> <ffffffff80486649>{rt_lock_slowunlock+70}
> <ffffffff802fde74>{get_request+375}
> <ffffffff80209a6d>{mcount+45}
> <ffffffff802fe04c>{get_request_wait+45}
> <ffffffff80209a6d>{mcount+45}
> <ffffffff803023c5>{as_merge+0}
> <ffffffff803023db>{as_merge+22}
> <ffffffff802fe425>{__make_request+750}
> <ffffffff803fc2b7>{md_thread+0}
> <ffffffff802fba78>{generic_make_request+380}
> <ffffffff80248e35>{constant_test_bit+9}
> <ffffffff80487960>{_raw_spin_unlock+51}
> <ffffffff803fc2b7>{md_thread+0}
> <ffffffff803ea43c>{raid1d+246}
> <ffffffff80209a6d>{mcount+45}
> <ffffffff80209a6d>{mcount+45}
> <ffffffff80486649>{rt_lock_slowunlock+70}
> <ffffffff80485568>{thread_return+230}
> <ffffffff80485568>{thread_return+230}
> <ffffffff80248e35>{constant_test_bit+9}
> <ffffffff80487960>{_raw_spin_unlock+51}
> <ffffffff80486649>{rt_lock_slowunlock+70}
> <ffffffff80485568>{thread_return+230}
> <ffffffff80487196>{__lock_text_start+14}
> <ffffffff803fc2b7>{md_thread+0}
> <ffffffff8023fb55>{keventd_create_kthread+0}
> <ffffffff803fc3cf>{md_thread+280}
> <ffffffff8023ff97>{autoremove_wake_function+0}
> <ffffffff8023fe5a>{kthread+224}
> <ffffffff802273bf>{schedule_tail+198}
> <ffffffff8020ae12>{child_rip+8}
> <ffffffff8023fb55>{keventd_create_kthread+0}
> <ffffffff80485568>{thread_return+230}
> <ffffffff80485568>{thread_return+230}
> <ffffffff80485568>{thread_return+230}
> <ffffffff8023fd7a>{kthread+0}
> <ffffffff8020ae0a>{child_rip+0}
> ---------------------------
> | preempt count: 00000002 ]
> | 2-level deep critical section nesting:
> ----------------------------------------
> .. [<ffffffff8048736f>] .... _raw_spin_lock+0x1b/0x28
> .....[<ffffffff80486619>] .. ( <= rt_lock_slowunlock+0x16/0x70)
> .. [<ffffffff80487453>] .... _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x33
> .....[<ffffffff8022cbbe>] .. ( <= __WARN_ON+0x24/0x8a)
>
> which makes:
>
> <ffffffff802792f9>{kmem_cache_alloc+207}
>
> the interesting part?
Yeah, I would say that. I'm sure it's also doing a NUMA alloc in there
too.
>
> However:
>
> rcrocomb@spanky:2.6.17-rt8$ grep DEBUG_INFO .config
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
> rcrocomb@spanky:2.6.17-rt8$ cd arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/
> rcrocomb@spanky:compressed$ gdb vmlinux
> GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.122rh)
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...
> (no debugging symbols found)
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
>
> (gdb) li *0xffffffff802792f9
> No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command.
>
> Huh.
??
Are you sure that vmlinux is the one created with the given config file?
There's been times when I added some configs and either forgot to
compile, or the compile failed, and I didn't notice, so the old binary
was being used.
-- Steve
>
> --
> Robert Crocombe
> rcrocomb@gmail.com
>
> In case this might be useful:
>
> rcrocomb@spanky:2.6.17-rt8$ grep -i debug .config
> .
> .
> .
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PI_LIST=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT is not set
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is not set
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG=y
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-03 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <e6babb600608012231r74470b77x6e7eaeab222ee160@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-02 5:37 ` Problems with 2.6.17-rt8 Robert Crocombe
2006-08-02 17:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 11:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 14:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:08 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2006-08-03 17:16 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 20:22 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-03 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 21:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 2:56 ` [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() " Bill Huey
2006-08-08 3:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 18:46 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 21:35 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 21:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 22:10 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 0:35 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 7:47 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 14:52 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 22:05 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-10 0:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-10 2:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 1:06 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 8:16 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-11 8:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 15:00 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-11 21:18 ` Bill Huey
[not found] ` <20060811221054.GA32459@gnuppy.monkey.org>
2006-08-14 17:56 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-14 23:44 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 10:43 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 17:53 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-18 11:59 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-22 0:21 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-22 1:37 ` rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...) Bill Huey
2006-08-22 23:20 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-22 23:21 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 17:14 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 17:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 20:20 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:08 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-24 1:22 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-24 1:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-25 7:19 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 1:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 1:28 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 2:37 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 10:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 10:49 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-28 18:33 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-28 20:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 4:05 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-29 17:11 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154621059.32264.29.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rcrocomb@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.