From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Robert Crocombe <rcrocomb@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:22:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060803202211.GA10720@gnuppy.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1154615261.32264.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:27:41AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The rest was probably caused as a side effect from above. The above is
> already broken!
>
> You have NUMA configured too, so this is also something to look at.
>
> I still wouldn't ignore the first bug message you got:
>
> ----
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: udev_run_devd/0x00000001/1568
>
> Call Trace:
> <ffffffff8045c693>{__schedule+155}
> <ffffffff8045f156>{_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+53}
> <ffffffff80242241>{task_blocks_on_rt_mutex+518}
> <ffffffff80252da0>{free_pages_bulk+39}
> <ffffffff80252da0>{free_pages_bulk+39}
> ...
> ----
>
> This could also have a side effect that messes things up.
>
> Unfortunately, right now I'm assigned to other tasks and I cant spend
> much more time on this at the moment. So hopefully, Ingo, Thomas or
> Bill, or someone else can help you find the reason for this problem.
free_pages_bulk is definitely being called inside of an atomic.
I force this stack trace when the in_atomic() test is true at the
beginning of the function.
[ 29.362863] Call Trace:
[ 29.367107] <ffffffff802a82ac>{free_pages_bulk+86}
[ 29.373122] <ffffffff80261726>{_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+44}
[ 29.380233] <ffffffff802a8778>{__free_pages_ok+428}
[ 29.386336] <ffffffff8024f101>{free_hot_page+25}
[ 29.392165] <ffffffff8022e298>{__free_pages+41}
[ 29.397898] <ffffffff806b604d>{__free_pages_bootmem+174}
[ 29.404457] <ffffffff806b5266>{free_all_bootmem_core+253}
[ 29.411112] <ffffffff806b5340>{free_all_bootmem_node+9}
[ 29.417574] <ffffffff806b254e>{numa_free_all_bootmem+61}
[ 29.424122] <ffffffff8046e96e>{_etext+0}
[ 29.429224] <ffffffff806b1392>{mem_init+128}
[ 29.434691] <ffffffff806a17ab>{start_kernel+377}
[ 29.440520] <ffffffff806a129b>{_sinittext+667}
[ 29.446669] ---------------------------
[ 29.450963] | preempt count: 00000001 ]
[ 29.455257] | 1-level deep critical section nesting:
[ 29.460732] ----------------------------------------
[ 29.466212] .. [<ffffffff806a169a>] .... start_kernel+0x68/0x221
[ 29.472815] .....[<ffffffff806a129b>] .. ( <= _sinittext+0x29b/0x2a2)
[ 29.480056]
bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-03 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <e6babb600608012231r74470b77x6e7eaeab222ee160@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-02 5:37 ` Problems with 2.6.17-rt8 Robert Crocombe
2006-08-02 17:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 11:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 14:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:08 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 15:48 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 17:16 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-03 20:22 ` Bill Huey [this message]
2006-08-03 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-03 21:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 2:56 ` [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() " Bill Huey
2006-08-08 3:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-08 18:46 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 21:35 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-08 21:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-08 22:10 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 0:35 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 7:47 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 14:52 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-09 22:05 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-10 0:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-08-10 2:18 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 1:06 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 8:16 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-08-11 8:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-11 15:00 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-11 21:18 ` Bill Huey
[not found] ` <20060811221054.GA32459@gnuppy.monkey.org>
2006-08-14 17:56 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-14 23:44 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 10:43 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-15 17:53 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-18 11:59 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-22 0:21 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-22 1:37 ` rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...) Bill Huey
2006-08-22 23:20 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-22 23:21 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 17:14 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 17:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-23 20:20 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:05 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-23 21:08 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-24 1:22 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-24 1:46 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-25 7:19 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 1:24 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 1:28 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 2:37 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-26 10:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-26 10:49 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-28 18:33 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-28 20:28 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 4:05 ` Robert Crocombe
2006-08-29 17:11 ` Bill Huey
2006-08-29 17:19 ` Robert Crocombe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060803202211.GA10720@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--to=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rcrocomb@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.